Are Short-Selling Restrictions Effective?

Author:

Barardehi Yashar1ORCID,Bird Andrew1,Karolyi Stephen2ORCID,Ruchti Thomas3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Argyros College of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange, California 92866;

2. Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Washington, District of Columbia 20219;

3. Department of the Treasury, Office of Financial Research, Washington, District of Columbia 20005

Abstract

Despite strong theoretical predictions based on disagreement, limited empirical evidence links short-selling restrictions to higher prices. We test this relationship using quasi-experimental methods based on rule 201, a threshold-based policy that restricts aggressive short selling when intraday returns cross −10%. When comparing stocks on either side of the threshold in the same hour of trading, we find that the restriction leads to 8% lower short-sale volume and 35 basis points higher daily returns. These price effects do not reverse after the restriction is lifted. This paper was accepted by Bruno Biais, finance. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.4987 .

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3