Measuring Information Preferences

Author:

Ho Emily H.12ORCID,Hagmann David34ORCID,Loewenstein George4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, New York 10458;

2. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611;

3. Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138;

4. Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

Abstract

Advances in medical testing and widespread access to the internet have made it easier than ever to obtain information. Yet, when it comes to some of the most important decisions in life, people often choose to remain ignorant for a variety of psychological and economic reasons. We design and validate an information preferences scale to measure an individual’s desire to obtain or avoid information that may be unpleasant but could improve future decisions. The scale measures information preferences in three domains that are psychologically and materially consequential: consumer finance, personal characteristics, and health. In three studies incorporating responses from over 2,300 individuals, we present tests of the scale’s reliability and validity. We show that the scale predicts a real decision to obtain (or avoid) information in each of the domains as well as decisions from out-of-sample, unrelated domains. Across settings, many respondents prefer to remain in a state of active ignorance even when information is freely available. Moreover, we find that information preferences are a stable trait but that an individual’s preference for information can differ across domains. This paper was accepted by Yuval Rottenstreich, judgment and decision making.

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Foucault’s error: The power of not knowing;European Review of Social Psychology;2024-08-13

2. Financial Mindfulness: A Scale;Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin;2024-07-30

3. Financial Homo Ignorans: Development and validation of a scale to measure individual differences in financial information ignorance;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance;2024-06

4. Making choices in repetitive risky situations with immediate feedback;Economics & Sociology;2024-06

5. Deliberately ignoring inequality to avoid rejecting unfair offers;Communications Psychology;2024-05-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3