Individual Differences in the Correspondence Between Psychological and Physiological Stress Indicators

Author:

Hilger KirstenORCID,Talić IrmaORCID,Renner Karl-HeinzORCID

Abstract

AbstractStress threatens physical and mental health. Reactions to acute stress comprise multiple levels, including negative thoughts, bodily symptoms and behaviors. Individuals differ in their reaction to acute stress, and importantly, also in the extent to which these levels align, with a closer correspondence between psychological and physiological stress indicators being beneficial for mental health and well-being. This preregistered study investigates such individual differences systematically by inducing psychological (social-evaluative) and physiological (cold water) stress with the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) in 149 healthy adults. Participants indicated the extent to which they perceived to be stressed and four physiological stress indicators (blood pressure, heart rate, salivary cortisol, alpha-amylase) were measured. Finally, multiple personality traits were assessed as potential moderators, including the Big Five, trait anxiety, and general cognitive ability. In line with previous research, psychological and physiological stress indicators were only weakly correlated. However, considering individual differences in personality, revealed especially conscientiousness and openness as potential moderators of the correspondence between psychological and physiological stress indicators. We propose individual differences in interoceptive abilities as another critical moderator, which deserves further investigation, and discuss how future research on individual differences in psycho-physiological correspondence can contribute to further our understanding of mental and physical diseases.Impact StatementStress has substantially increased over the last decade. A missing correspondence between self-reported stress and physiological stress measures has been related to mental illnesses and lower well-being. In revealing that specific personality traits might act as potential moderators of the psycho-physiological correspondence, our research complements recent prospects towards personalized medicine and offers starting points for the development of individualized psychological interventions and prevention programs.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference63 articles.

1. Biological and psychological markers of stress in humans: Focus on the Trier Social Stress Test;Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews,2014

2. Measuring acute stress response through physiological signals: towards a quantitative assessment of stress

3. A framework for studying personality in the stress process.

4. Borkenau, P. , & Ostendorf, F . (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI). Hogrefe.

5. Bulheller, S. , & Häcker, H. O . (1998). Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM). Deutsche Bearbeitung und Normierung nach JC Raven. Frankfurt: Pearson Assessment.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3