The chaos in calibrating crop models
Author:
Wallach DanielORCID, Palosuo Taru, Thorburn Peter, Hochman Zvi, Gourdain Emmanuelle, Andrianasolo Fety, Asseng Senthold, Basso Bruno, Buis Samuel, Crout Neil, Dibari Camilla, Dumont Benjamin, Ferrise Roberto, Gaiser Thomas, Garcia Cecile, Gayler Sebastian, Ghahramani Afshin, Hiremath Santosh, Hoek Steven, Horan Heidi, Hoogenboom Gerrit, Huang Mingxia, Jabloun Mohamed, Jansson Per-Erik, Jing Qi, Justes Eric, Kersebaum Kurt Christian, Klosterhalfen Anne, Launay Marie, Lewan Elisabet, Luo Qunying, Maestrini Bernardo, Mielenz Henrike, Moriondo Marco, Nariman Zadeh Hasti, Padovan Gloria, Olesen Jørgen Eivind, Poyda Arne, Priesack Eckart, Pullens Johannes Wilhelmus Maria, Qian Budong, Schütze Niels, Shelia Vakhtang, Souissi Amir, Specka Xenia, Srivastava Amit Kumar, Stella Tommaso, Streck Thilo, Trombi Giacomo, Wallor Evelyn, Wang Jing, Weber Tobias K.D., Weihermüller Lutz, de Wit Allard, Wöhling Thomas, Xiao Liujun, Zhao Chuang, Zhu Yan, Seidel Sabine J.
Abstract
AbstractCalibration, the estimation of model parameters based on fitting the model to experimental data, is among the first steps in many applications of system models and has an important impact on simulated values. Here we propose and illustrate a novel method of developing guidelines for calibration of system models. Our example is calibration of the phenology component of crop models. The approach is based on a multi-model study, where all teams are provided with the same data and asked to return simulations for the same conditions. All teams are asked to document in detail their calibration approach, including choices with respect to criteria for best parameters, choice of parameters to estimate and software. Based on an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the various choices, we propose calibration recommendations that cover a comprehensive list of decisions and that are based on actual practices.HighlightsWe propose a new approach to deriving calibration recommendations for system modelsApproach is based on analyzing calibration in multi-model simulation exercisesResulting recommendations are holistic and anchored in actual practiceWe apply the approach to calibration of crop models used to simulate phenologyRecommendations concern: objective function, parameters to estimate, software used
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference66 articles.
1. Ahuja, L. R. , Ma, L. , (eds.), 2011. Methods of introducing system models into agricultural research. American Society of Agronomy. 2. Ahuja, L.R. , Ma, L. , Ahuja, Laj R. , Ma, L. , 2011. A Synthesis of Current Parameterization Approaches and Needs for Further Improvements, in: Methods of Introducing System Models into Agricultural Research. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, pp. 427–440. https://doi.org/10.2134/advagricsystmodel2.c15 3. Akaike, H. , 1973. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle, in: Petrov, B.N. , Csaki, F. (Eds.), In B. N. Petrov , & F. Csaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp. 267–281. 4. Angulo, C. , Rötter, R. , Lock, R. , Enders, A. , Fronzek, S. , 2013. Implication of crop model calibration strategies for assessing regional impacts of climate change in Europe. Agric. For. 5. A sequential approach for determining the cultivar coefficients of peanut lines using end-of-season data of crop performance trials;F. Crop. Res.,2008
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|