Conservation vs. Wild-Animal Suffering : how can population dynamics help?

Abstract

AbstractConservation and ethical consideration for animal welfare in the wild appear to be synergetic because they both care for non-human animals. However, many practices such as culling seem to achieve conservation purposes but at the cost of producing a lot of wild-animal suffering, antagonizing conservationists and animal rights advocates. To explore this tension, we model the suffering of animals in wild ecosystems by resorting to classical population dynamics equations and using death rates as a metric of suffering. Our results show that, depending on the structure and parameters of the ecosystem, animal rights advocates and conservationists can have either opposing or compatible interests, where conserving species can go hand in hand with reducing the overall suffering. These models contribute to the concrete question of how to cope with suffering in the wild and may help ecosystem managers who are regularly confronted with interventions in the wild.