Sex differences in cocaine self-administration behaviour under Long Access versus Intermittent Access conditions

Abstract

A widely accepted rodent model to study cocaine addiction involves allowing animals continuous access to drug during long self-administration sessions (Long-access or LgA). This produces continuously high brain concentrations of drug during each session. This might not model the pharmacokinetics of cocaine use in experienced human users, which are thought to involve intermittently spiking brain cocaine concentrations within and between bouts of use. Intermittent-access (IntA) cocaine self-administration models this spiking pattern in rats. IntA is also particularly effective in increasing incentive motivation for drug. Most IntA studies have been conducted in male rats. Both humans and non-human animals can show sex differences in all phases of the addiction process. We compared cocaine use in female and male rats that self-administered the drug (0.25 mg/kg/injection, i.v.) during 10 daily, 6-h LgA or IntA sessions. Cocaine intake was greatest under LgA, and female LgA rats escalated their intake. However, only IntA rats (both sexes) developed locomotor sensitization to self-administered cocaine and sensitization was greatest in the females. Five and 25 days after the last self-administration session, we quantified incentive motivation for cocaine by measuring breakpoints for the drug (0.083-0.75 mg/kg/injection) under progressive ratio. Breakpoints were similar in IntA and LgA rats. There were no sex differences in breakpoints under LgA. However, under IntA, females reached higher breakpoints for cocaine than males. Thus, LgA might be best suited to study sex differences in cocaine intake, while IntA might be best suited to study sex differences in incentive motivational processes in cocaine addiction.