Abstract
AbstractBackgroundKnee pain affects one in three adolescents, which makes it one of the most common pain sites. Guideline recommendations about the clinical selection of patients likely to benefit from interventions are unclear, which leads to treatment heterogeneity and the potential of wasted resources among adolescents with a good prognosis. In contrast, adolescents with a poorer prognosis may not receive sufficient care. A newly developed clinical decision-support tool (The MAP-Knee Tool) intends to support clinicians in engaging with patients and adjusting the clinicians’ evidence-based practices to accommodate patient preferences and treatment needs via a shared decision-making process. The aims of this trial are 1) to investigate the effectiveness of using a clinical decision-support tool (The MAP-Knee Tool) compared with usual care in adolescents with non-traumatic knee pain in reducing pain measured by KOOS-Child Pain after 12 weeks and 2) to investigate how the intervention worked, for whom, why and under which circumstances applying realist evaluation methodology.MethodsThis trial is a cluster-randomised superiority trial with a delayed intervention and a realist evaluation. Six hospital departments start with a usual care period of 4 months before randomly crossing over to using the intervention (The MAP-Knee Tool) after 4, 6, or 8 months, respectively. We will recruit 290 adolescents suffering from non-traumatic knee pain diagnoses who are followed for one year, with the change in KOOS-Child Pain after 12 weeks considered the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes include 1) Global Rating of Change, 2) EQ-5D-Youth, 3) Anterior Knee Pain Youth, 4) the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short version, and 5) sports participation. The realist evaluation will utilise a prospective, qualitative approach for collecting data needed to develop and test a program theory and identify context-mechanism-outcome configurations essential for understanding how outcomes are achieved within specific contexts.DiscussionThis trial focuses on how the initial clinical encounter can be improved to meet the support and management needs of adolescents with chronic knee pain seeking treatment for knee pain in secondary care and investigates how the intervention worked, for whom, why and under which circumstances.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov(NCT05791513). Prospectively registered on March 30th, 2023.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference66 articles.
1. UK health performance: findings of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010;The Lancet,2013
2. Bjerrum L , Ertmann RK , Jarbøl DE , Jensen MB , Kristensen JK , Maagaard R . Almen medicin. 1st ed. Hunskår S , editor. Munksgaard; 2014.
3. Care-seeking behaviour of adolescents with patellofemoral pain: a retrospective cohort study;F1000Research 2022 11:161 [Internet],2022
4. Do pain problems in young school children persist into early adulthood? A 13-year follow-up;European Journal of Pain,2004
5. Child and Family Antecedents of Pain During the Transition to Adolescence: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study