Author:
Aparicio Tomas,Nyerges Akos,Nagy István,Pal Csaba,Martínez-García Esteban,de Lorenzo Víctor
Abstract
SUMMARYThe mismatch repair (MMR) system is one of the key molecular devices that prokaryotic cells have for ensuring fidelity of DNA replication. While the canonical MMR of E. coli involves 3 proteins (encoded by mutS, mutL and mutH), the soil bacterium Pseudomonads putida has only 2 bona fide homologues (mutS and mutL) and the sensitivity of this abridged system to different types of mismatches is unknown. On this background, sensitivity to MMR of this bacterium was inspected through single stranded (ss) DNA recombineering of the pyrF gene (the prokaryotic equivalent to yeast’s URA3) with mutagenic oligos representative of every possible mispairing under either wild-type conditions, permanent deletion of mutS or transient loss of mutL activity (brought about by the thermoinducible dominant negative allele mutLE36K). Analysis of single nucleotide mutations borne by clones resistant to fluoroorotic acid (5FOA, the target of wild type PyrF) pinpointed prohibited and tolerated single-nucleotide replacements and exposed a clear grading of mismatch recognition. The resulting data unequivocally established the hierarchy A:G< C:C< G:A< C:A, A:A, G:G, T:T, T:G, A:C, C:T< G:T, T:C as the one prevalent in Pseudomonas putida. This information was vital for enabling recombineering strategies aimed at single-nucleotide changes in this biotechnologically important species.Originality-Significance StatementSingle-stranded DNA (ssDNA) recombineering has emerged in recent years as one of the most powerful technologies of genome editing in E. coli and other Enterobacteria. However, the efforts to expand the concept and the methods towards environmental microorganisms such as Pseudomonas putida have been limited thus far by several gaps in our fundamental knowledge of how nucleotide mismatch repair (MMR) operates in such non-model species. One critical bottleneck is the hierarchy of recognition of different types of base mispairings as well as the need of setting up strategies for counteracting MMR and thus enabling tolerance to all types of changes. The work presented here tackles both issues and makes P. putida amenable to sophisticated genetic manipulations that were impossible before.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference43 articles.
1. Aparicio, T. , de Lorenzo, V. , and Martínez-García, E. (2017) Broadening the SEVA Plasmid Repertoire to Facilitate Genomic Editing of Gram-Negative Bacteria. In Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology Protocols: Genetic, Genomic and System Analyses of Pure Cultures. McGenity, T.J. , Timmis, K.N. , and Nogales, B. (eds). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 9–27.
2. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Counterselection Boosts Recombineering Efficiency in Pseudomonas putida;Biotechnol J,2018
3. CRISPR
/Cas9‐enhanced ss
DNA
recombineering for
Pseudomonas putida
4. Improved Thermotolerance of Genome-Reduced Pseudomonas putida EM42 Enables Effective Functioning of the PL /cI857 System;Biotechnol J,2019
5. The Ssr protein (T1E_1405) from Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E enables oligonucleotide-based recombineering in platform strain P. putida EM42;Biotechnol J,2016