Plant structural and nutritional responses to drought differ among common pasture species

Author:

Catunda Karen L. M.ORCID,Churchill Amber C.ORCID,Power Sally A.ORCID,Zhang HaiyangORCID,Fuller Kathryn J.ORCID,Moore Ben D.ORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn the face of a changing climate, research indicates that more frequent and severe drought conditions are critical problems that will constrain production of high-quality forage and influence the performance of grazing animals in the future. In addition, the duration of drought and potential trade-offs between plant morphology and nutritional composition may influence plant drought adaptation strategies across pasture species, and the consequences for forage quality are not well understood. Here we present the results of a study investigating the effects of drought on biomass productivity, dead material, leaf:stem biomass allocation and nutritional composition (whole-plant and tissue-specific) across nine diverse pasture species. For this, we conducted a field experiment exposing species to a 6-month period of simulated severe drought (60% rainfall reduction during winter and spring) and samples were collected at multiple harvests. We found that drought had different, harvest-specific effects on plant biomass structure and nutritional composition among pasture species. The severity of drought impacts on productivity, but not on nutritional quality, increased with drought duration. In general, drought strongly reduced productivity, increased the percentage of dead material and had mixed effects (increases, decreases and no effect) on leaf:stem ratio and concentrations of crude protein, non-structural carbohydrates, neutral detergent fibre and lignin. Changes in plant-level nutritional quality were driven by simultaneous changes in both leaf and stem tissues for most, but not all, species. Our findings may be especially helpful for selection of adapted species/cultivars that could minimize potential drought risks on forage, thereby optimising pasture performance under future drought scenarios.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference75 articles.

1. ABARES- Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, 2016. Land use in Australia-at a glance. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Canberra, ACT.https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Land%20use%20in%20Australia%20at%20a%20glance%202016.pdf (accessed 9December 2020).

2. Climate extreme effects on the chemical composition of temperate grassland species under ambient and elevated CO2: a comparison of fructan and non-fructan accumulators;Plos One,2014

3. Comparison of nutritive values of grasses and legume species using forage quality index. Songklanakarin J;Sci. Technol,2012

4. AOAC- Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1990. Official methods of analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.

5. Responses to drought and flooding in tropical forage grasses;I. Biomass allocation, leaf growth and mineral nutrients. Plant Soil,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3