Short-term outcomes associated with temozolomide vs. PCV chemotherapy for 1p/19q-codeleted WHO grade III anaplastic oligodendrogliomas: a national evaluation

Abstract

AbstractPURPOSEThe optimal chemotherapy regimen between temozolomide (TMZ) and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) remains uncertain for newly-diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO). We therefore addressed this question using a national database.METHODSPatients newly-diagnosed with 1p/19q-codeleted W.H.O. grade III AO between 2010-2016 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Predictors of receiving first-line single-agent TMZ vs. multi-agent PCV were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier techniques and evaluated by multivariable Cox regression.RESULTS1,360 AO patients were identified: 74.5% (n=1,013) treated with TMZ, 9.6% (n=131) with PCV, and 15.9% (n=216) with no chemotherapy in the first-line setting. In multivariable logistic analysis, PCV utilization increased from 2010 to 2016 (OR=1.38/year, 95%CI: 1.22-1.56, p<0.001) and was less commonly utilized in privately insured patients (OR=0.38 vs. uninsured, 95%CI: 0.15-0.97, p=0.04). In survival analyses (33.1% reached endpoint), there was no difference in unadjusted OS between TMZ (5yr-OS 60.1%, 95%CI: 55.9-64.1) and PCV (5yr-OS 61.1%, 95%CI: 45.6-73.5; p=0.42). There remained no OS difference between TMZ and PCV in the 75.9% (n=1,032) of AO patients that also received radiotherapy (p=0.51), in the Cox regression analysis adjusted by age, extent of resection, and radiotherapy (TMZ vs. PCV HR=1.31, 95%CI: 0.83-2.08, p=0.24), and in subgroup analyses that incorporate KPS or MGMT status.CONCLUSIONSIn a national database of AOs managed in the ‘real-world’ setting, there is no difference in the short-term mortality between first-line TMZ and PCV chemotherapy. These findings provide preliminary data while we await the long-term results from the CODEL trial.