Abstract
BackgroundSeasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) is recommended for disease control in settings with moderate to highPlasmodium falciparumtransmission and currently depends on administration of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine with amodiaquine. However, poor regimenadherence and the increasedfrequencyof sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistant parasite mutations may threaten SMC’s effectiveness. We need guidance to de-risk the development of drug compounds for malaria prevention.MethodsWe combined an individual-based malaria transmission model that has explicit parasite growth with drug pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models. We modelled SMC drug attributes for several possible modes-of-action, linked to their potential public health impact. Global sensitivity analyses identified trade-offs between drug elimination half-life, maximum killing effect, and SMC coverage, and optimisation identified minimum requirements to maximise malaria burden reductions.FindingsModel predictions show that preventing infection for the entire period between SMC cycles is more important than drug curative efficacy for clinical disease effectiveness outcomes, but similarly important for impact on prevalence. When four SMC cycles are deployed to children under five years with high levels of coverage (69% of children receiving all cycles), drug candidates require a duration of protection half-life of >23 days (elimination half-life >10 days) to achieve >75% clinical incidence and severe disease reductions (measured over the intervention period in the target population, compared with no intervention across a range of modelled scenarios). High coverage is critical to achieve these targets, requiring >60% of children received all SMC cycles and >90% of children at least one cycle regardless of the drug’s duration.InterpretationWhile efficacy is crucial for malaria prevalence reductions, chemoprevention development should select drug candidates for their duration of protection to maximise burden reductions, with the duration half-life determiningcycle timing. Explicitlydesigning or selectingdrug properties to increase communityuptake is paramount.FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Swiss National Science Foundation.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献