Abstract
AbstractsBackgroundThe benefits of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) are not well established. This study aimed to evaluate whether EVT is superior to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) alone in DMVOs.MethodsThis study analyzed data from the K-NET Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational registry of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT or IV tPA. The study evaluated patients with acute DMVOs who were treated with EVT and/or IV tPA. DMVOs was defined as occlusions in M2-M3 segment of the middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, or posterior cerebral artery. The analysis included primary DMVOs and excluded secondary DMVOs, such as distal embolism after recanalization of proximal vessel occlusion. Propensity score-matched analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes between EVT and IV tPA alone. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 or no worsening at 90 days. An excellent outcome was defined as an mRS score of 0-1.ResultsThe study included 1148 patients with DMVOs, of whom 816 were treated with EVT and 332 were IV tPA alone. Before propensity score matching, the incidence of good and excellent outcomes was significantly lower in EVT group (good outcomes: EVT 50.3% vs. IV tPA 68.0%, p<0.01; excellent outcomes: 39.8% vs. 59.8%, p<0.001). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences between EVT and IV tPA groups in good outcomes (EVT 57.8% vs. IV tPA 61.3%, p=0.51), excellent outcomes (46.6% vs. 55.0%, p=0.17), all cerebral hemorrhage (11.6% vs. 12.7%, p=0.74), and symptomatic hemorrhage (2.9% vs. 0.6%, p=0.13). Subarachnoid hemorrhage was more frequent in EVT group (14.5% vs. IV tPA 0%).ConclusionsThe benefits of EVT for acute DMVOs were similar to IV-tPA alone. Randomized multicenter trials are warranted to establish the superiority of EVT over IV-tPA alone for DMVOs.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory