Through the patients’ eyes - Psychometric evaluation of the 64-item version of the Experienced Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (EPAT-64)

Author:

Christalle EvaORCID,Zeh StefanORCID,Führes HannahORCID,Schellhorn Alica,Hahlweg PolaORCID,Zill JördisORCID,Härter MartinORCID,Bokemeyer CarstenORCID,Gallinat JürgenORCID,Gebhardt ChristofferORCID,Magnussen ChristinaORCID,Müller Volkmar,Schmalstieg-Bahr KatharinaORCID,Strahl AndréORCID,Kriston LeventeORCID,Scholl IsabelleORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundPatient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are valuable tools for evaluating patient-centeredness (PC) from the patients’ perspective. Despite their utility, a comprehensive PREM addressing PC has been lacking. To bridge this gap, we developed the preliminary version of the Experienced Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (EPAT), a disease-generic tool based on the integrative model of PC comprising 16 dimensions. It demonstrated content validity. The aim of this study was to test its psychometric properties and to develop a final 64-items version (EPAT-64).MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, we included adult patients treated for cardiovascular diseases, cancer, musculoskeletal diseases, and mental disorders in inpatient or outpatient settings in Germany. For each dimension of PC, we selected four items based on item characteristics such as item difficulty and corrected item-total correlation. We tested structural validity using confirmatory factor analysis, examined reliability by McDondald’s Omega, and tested construct validity by examining correlations with general health status and satisfaction with care.ResultsAnalysis of data from 2.024 patients showed excellent acceptance and acceptable item-total-correlations for all EPAT-64 items, with few items demonstrating ceiling effects. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated the best fit of a bifactor model, where each item loaded on both a general factor and a dimension-specific factor. Omega showed high reliability for the general factor while varying for specific dimensions. Construct validity was confirmed by absence of strong correlations with general health status and a strong correlation of the general factor with satisfaction with care.ConclusionsThe EPAT-64 demonstrated commendable psychometric properties. This tool allows comprehensive assessment of PC, offering flexibility to users who can measure each dimension with a 4-item module or choose modules based on their needs. The EPAT-64 serves multiple purposes, including quality improvement initiatives and evaluation of interventions aiming to enhance PC. Its versatility empowers users in diverse healthcare settings.What is already known on this topicPatient-reported experience measures (PREMs) can be used to assess patient-centeredness (PC) from the patients’ perspective. The “Experienced Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire” (EPAT) is the first PREM to comprehensively assess 16 dimensions of PC.What this study addsIn this study, we tested the psychometric properties of all items developed for the EPAT and developed the 64-item version of the EPAT (EPAT-64), which demonstrated good psychometric properties.How this study might affect research, practice or policyThe EPAT-64 can be used in research and routine care, e.g. to evaluate interventions, provide feedback to healthcare professionals, support quality improvement, set benchmarks, and, consequently improve PC.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference51 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press 2001.

2. From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider

3. Patient-centered care is associated with decreased health care utilization;The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine,2011

4. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations

5. Patient-Centered Approaches to Health Care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3