Patient and caregiver perceptions of electronic health records interoperability in the NHS and its impact on care quality: A focus group study

Author:

Li EdmondORCID,Lounsbury OliviaORCID,Clarke JonathanORCID,Ashrafian HutanORCID,Darzi AraORCID,Neves Ana LuisaORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe proliferation of electronic health records (EHR) in health systems of many high-income countries has ushered in profound changes to how clinical information is used, stored, and disseminated. For patients, being able to easily access and share their health information electronically through interoperable EHRs can often impact safety and their experience when seeking care across healthcare providers. While extensive research exists examining how EHRs affected workflow and technical challenges such as limited interoperability, much of it was done from the viewpoint of healthcare staff rather than from patients themselves. This leaves a critical knowledge gap in our evidence base to inform better implementation of health information technologies which needs addressing.Aims and ObjectivesThis study aimed to explore how patients with chronic conditions or polypharmacy and their caregivers perceive the current state of EHR interoperability, identify instances where it was associated with negative health outcomes, and elucidate patient-driven recommendations to address concerns raised.MethodsA total of 18 patients and caregivers participated in five online focus groups between May-July 2022. Thematic analysis was performed to generate codes and derive higher-order themes.ResultsParticipants highlighted that EHR interoperability in the NHS does not meet patient needs and expectations. While patients’ understanding of the concept of EHR interoperability was mixed, most were able to describe how the inability to seamlessly share health information within EHR has negatively impacted care. Limited interoperability contributed to inaccurate medical records, perpetuated existing incorrect information, impaired clinical decision-making, and often required patients to resort to using workarounds. Patients also voiced ideas for potential solutions for consideration. These included a move towards a one-centralised system approach, strengthening data security measures to augment other efforts to increase interoperability, prioritising health information technology training for NHS staff, and involving more allied health professionals and patients themselves in the EHR data curation process.ConclusionOur study contributes to the existing body of literature by providing the perspectives of patients and carers most likely to encounter interoperability challenges and therefore those most ideally positioned to propose potential solutions. As highlighted by patients, researchers and policymakers should consider social, educational, and organisational solutions, in addition to technical solutions.Public Interest SummaryLack of interoperability,i.e.,the ability to share a patient’s health information electronically between healthcare providers, can affect the quality of care received. However, much of the existing research was done from the viewpoint of healthcare staff rather than from patients themselves. This study explored the views of patients regarding what they feel interoperability in the NHS is currently like, how they think it affects their care, and what they think can be done to improve it. Patients reported interoperability to often be poor. It caused inconvenience both to themselves and their healthcare provider, and negatively impacted their experience getting care overall. Patient suggestions for improvement included centralising and reducing the number of existing systems, having more training for healthcare staff, and supporting patients and other healthcare staff in managing their health data.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference30 articles.

1. Effect of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Intervention on Adverse Drug Events A Cluster Randomized Trial + Supplemental content and Audio;JAMA Netw Open [Internet,2019

2. Xiao AQ , Acosta FX . Implementation and Impact of Psychiatric Electronic Medical Records in a Public Medical Center. Perspect Heal Inf Manag. 2016;13(Fall).

3. Ramaiah M , Subrahmanian E , Sriram RD , Lide BB . Workflow and electronic health records in small medical practices. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9.

4. Clinical simulation and workflow by use of two clinical information systems, the electronic health record and digital dictation;Stud Health Technol Inform,2013

5. Physician experiences transitioning between an older versus newer electronic health record for electronic prescribing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3