Health indicators as measures of individual health status, perceived importance, and their associated factors—an observational study

Author:

Jing XiaORCID,Zhou Yuchun,Sokoya Temiloluwa,Diaz Sebastian,Law Timothy,Himawan Lina,Lekey Francisca,Shi Lu,Griffin Sarah,Gimbel Ronald W.

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSelf-rated health status, a subjective measure, is used broadly to describe an individual’s overall health status. Our long-term goal is to create a more objective, comprehensive, and accurate measure of individual health status. We selected 29 health indicators and prioritized them by conducting online surveys. Thirteen of these 29 indicators received relatively more consistent ratings across 3 samples.ObjectivesTo explore the main and interaction effects of 4 demographic factors as independent variables (age, gender, professional group, and educational level) in the importance ratings of the 13 health indicators.MethodsWe conducted a 4-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with post-hoc testing to examine the effects of independent variables on all 13 dependent variables. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlation analysis were also conducted.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingAn online survey (≥ 18 years).Participants791 participants in the USA.Results13 health indicators were significantly correlated with each other. Age correlated with most of the health indicators (8 of 13). The MANOVA modeling results indicated that gender, age, and education levels significantly affected the combination of the 13 health indicators. There was a significant interaction effect by age and professional group on 5 health indicators.ConclusionsAge is critical in rating the 13 health indicators. Among all the statistically significant main effects of demographic factors, the effect sizes descend regarding age, gender, educational level, and interaction between age and professional group. These results can provide a foundation for further studies to explore behavioral interventions for individual subgroups.Article SummaryStrengths and limitations of this studyThe work establishes the interactions and effects between demographic data (age, gender, education, and professional group) and the perceived importance of 13 health indicators via MANOVA analysisThe interactions and effects of demographic data on the importance ratings of the 13 health indicatorscan guide future study designs for behavioral interventionsDeep analysis of the demographic variables and their effects on and interactions with the rating results are helpful for thoroughly understanding the perspectivesThe study is an observational study despite with relatively large sample size and a robust analysisThe data are not racially representative

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference23 articles.

1. Healthy People 2020 H. Healthy People 2020 Leading Health Indicators: Progress Update, 2020.

2. LCP. UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) Health Index Explorer. Secondary UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) Health Index Explorer 2018. https://healthindex.lcp.uk.com/.

3. Medicine Io. Vital Signs: Core Metrics for Health and Health Care Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015.

4. UK OfNS. UK Census 2021-Health and social care. Secondary UK Census 2021-Health and social care 2022. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare.

5. Self-Rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3