Experimental evidence that animal societies vary in size due to sex differences in cooperation

Abstract

AbstractCooperative breeding societies allow the costs of reproduction to be shared. However, as groups become larger, such benefits often decrease and competition increases. This is predicted to select for an optimal group size, yet variation in groups is a ubiquitous feature of cooperative breeding animals. Here we experimentally established groups (ngroups=96) of cooperative breeding ostriches, Struthio camelus, with different numbers of males and females and manipulated the potential for cooperation over incubation. There was a clear optimal group size for males. Their reproductive success was maximized in groups with four or more females and no other males, irrespective of cooperation over incubation. Conversely, female reproductive success was strongly dependent on the benefits of cooperating over incubation, being maximized in groups with either many males or many females. In intermediate sized groups, both male and female reproductive success was reduced by sexual conflict over the timing of mating and incubation. Our experiments show that sex differences in the opposing forces of cooperation and competition can explain why variation in cooperative groups is widespread.