Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome

Author:

Ellingford Jamie MORCID,Ahn Joo Wook,Bagnall Richard D,Baralle DianaORCID,Barton Stephanie,Campbell Chris,Downes Kate,Ellard SianORCID,Duff-Farrier Celia,FitzPatrick David RORCID,Ingles JodieORCID,Krishnan Neesha,Lord JennyORCID,Martin Hilary CORCID,Newman William GORCID,O’Donnell-Luria AnneORCID,Ramsden Simon C,Rehm Heidi LORCID,Richardson EbonyORCID,Singer-Berk Moriel,Taylor Jenny CORCID,Williams Maggie,Wood Jordan C,Wright Caroline FORCID,Harrison Steven MORCID,Whiffin NicolaORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTPurposeThe majority of clinical genetic testing focuses almost exclusively on regions of the genome that directly encode proteins. The important role of variants in non-coding regions in penetrant disease is, however, increasingly being demonstrated, and the use of whole genome sequencing in clinical diagnostic settings is rising across a large range of genetic disorders. Despite this, there is no existing guidance on how current guidelines designed primarily for variants in protein-coding regions should be adapted for variants identified in other genomic contexts.MethodsWe convened a panel of clinical and research scientists with wide-ranging expertise in clinical variant interpretation, with specific experience in variants within non-coding regions. This panel discussed and refined an initial draft of the guidelines which were then extensively tested and reviewed by external groups.ResultsWe discuss considerations specifically for variants in non-coding regions of the genome. We outline how to define candidate regulatory elements, highlight examples of mechanisms through which non-coding region variants can lead to penetrant monogenic disease, and outline how existing guidelines can be adapted for these variants.ConclusionThese recommendations aim to increase the number and range of non-coding region variants that can be clinically interpreted, which, together with a compatible phenotype, can lead to new diagnoses and catalyse the discovery of novel disease mechanisms.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3