Opportunities to sustain a multi-country quality of care network: lessons on the actions of four countries Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda

Author:

Lemma SeblewengelORCID,Daniels-Howell CallieORCID,Tufa Asebe Amenu,Sarker Mithun,Akter KohenourORCID,Nakidde CatherineORCID,Seruwagi GloriaORCID,Dube AlbertORCID,Mwandira KondwaniORCID,Taye Desalegn Bekele,English Mike,Shawar Yusra Ribhi,Mwaba KasondeORCID,Djellouli NehlaORCID,Colbourn Tim,Marchant TanyaORCID,

Abstract

AbstractThe Quality of Care Network (QCN) is a global initiative that was established in 2017 under the leadership of WHO in 11 low-and-middle income countries to improve maternal, newborn, and child health. The vision was that the Quality of Care Network would be embedded within member countries and continued beyond the initial implementation period: that the Network would be sustained. This paper investigated the experience of actions taken to sustain QCN in four Network countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda) and reports on lessons learned. Multiple iterative rounds of data collection were conducted through qualitative interviews with global and national stakeholders, and non-participatory observation of health facilities and meetings. A total of 241 interviews, 42 facility and four meeting observations were carried out. We conducted a thematic analysis of all data using a framework approach that defined six critical actions that can be taken to promote sustainability. The analysis revealed that these critical actions were present with varying degrees in each of the four countries. Although vulnerabilities were observed, there was good evidence to support that actions were taken to institutionalize the innovation within the health system, to motivate micro-level actors, plan opportunities for reflection and adaptation from the outset, and to support strong government ownership. Two actions were largely absent and weakened confidence in future sustainability: managing financial uncertainties and fostering community ownership.Evidence from four countries suggested that the QCN model would not be sustained in its original format, largely because of financial vulnerability and insufficient time to embed the innovation at the sub-national level. But especially the efforts made to institutionalize the innovation in existing systems meant that some characteristics of QCN may be carried forward within broader government quality improvement initiatives.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference43 articles.

1. World Health Organization. The network for improving quality of care for maternal, newborn and child health: evolution, implementation and progress: 2017-2020 report. Geneva: : World Health Organization 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/343370 (accessed 10 Jan 2022).

2. Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries

3. World Health Organization. Quality of carel1: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. 2006;:38.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43470 (accessed 10 Jan 2022).

4. Quality health services: a planning guide. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240011632 (accessed 10 Jan 2022).

5. Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3