The experiences and perceptions of working with Anaesthesia Associates: a survey of UK anaesthetists in training

Author:

Evans BenORCID,Turkoglu Leyla M,Brooks JamesORCID,Subramaniam JeevakanORCID,Edwardson StuartORCID,McCrossan Roopa,Freeman Naomi,Wong Danny J. N.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe future and sustainability of the anaesthetic workforce is a growing concern with a projected shortfall of 11,000 anaesthetists by 2040. The supply of anaesthetists able to provide safe anaesthesia care does not meet the rising demand of surgical waiting lists. In recent years, changes to recruitment and curricula for anaesthetic specialty training have resulted in significant bottlenecks to training progression, further compounding the deficit in the numbers of fully trained anaesthetists. A rapid expansion the Anaesthesia Associate (AA) workforce has been proposed as one of the solutions to this worsening gap. However, no robust analysis of the impact of the expansion in AA numbers on anaesthetists in training has been conducted. There remain a number of concerns regarding access to training experience, scope of supervision, out of hours workload, equity of pay and cost of training, as well as the impact on future numbers of anaesthetists in training. In order to help shape the future integration of this workforce, we surveyed current anaesthetists in training, asking about their experiences of working with AAs, and their perceptions of the future expansion and regulation of these associate professionals. Through an online survey, we collected both quantitative and qualitative data to give a thorough representation of anaesthetists in training experience. Our results confirm that the impact of AAs on training remains a polarising topic. A third of anaesthetists in training with prior experience of working with AAs reported a negative impact on their training experience. Factors mentioned included lack of case numbers, lack of access to learning and performing regional anaesthesia, and lack of clarity in lines of supervision. Of those with no prior experience working with AAs, there was a strong negative perception towards expansion of the workforce. A small proportion described a positive experience, indicating that with clear role definition, careful implementation along with co-operation, a positive experience in all departments could be achievable. Our findings suggest a need for increased consultation and communication with stakeholders in the anaesthesia workforce, including anaesthetists in training, to ensure smooth and safe integration of the AA workforce.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference28 articles.

1. Medical Workforce Census Report. Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2020.

2. Surgical activity in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide observational cohort study;British Journal of Anaesthesia,2021

3. DHSC. Our Plan for Patients: Policy Paper., 2022.

4. RCoA. Health Select Committee: Inquiry into Clearing the Backlog Caused by the Pandemic.

5. Royal College of Anaesthetists. https://rcoa.ac.uk/who-are-anaesthesia-associates (accessed April 12, 2023).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3