Author:
Hillus David,Schwarz Tatjana,Tober-Lau Pinkus,Hastor Hana,Thibeault Charlotte,Kasper Stefanie,Helbig Elisa T.,Lippert Lena J.,Tscheak Patricia,Schmidt Marie Luisa,Riege Johanna,Solarek André,Kalle Christof von,Dang-Heine Chantip,Kopankiewicz Piotr,Suttorp Norbert,Drosten Christian,Bias Harald,Seybold Joachim,Conrad Claudia,Steuer Doris,Gläser Ute,Sinnigen Anne-Sophie,Rubisch Carolin,Olk Nadine,Hasler Lisbeth,Sanchez-Rezza Angela,Kronenberg Paolo,Horn Alexandra,Koch Willi,Stubbemann Paula,Gabelich Julie-Anne,Münn Friederike,Tesch Julia,Mackeldanz Petra,Bergfeld Leon,Bleicker Tobias,Beheim-Schwarzbach Jörn Ilmo,Hiller Anna,Brumhard Sophia,Bardtke Lara,Pohl Kai,Wendisch Daniel,Georg Philipp,Treue Denise,Briesemeister Dana,Schlesinger Jenny,Hetey Andreas,Kegel Luisa,Richter Annelie,Al-Rim Ben,Maeß Birgit,Behn Kerstin,Lysi Michelle,Zvorc Saskia,Rönnefarth Maria,Schmidt Sein,Krannich Alexander,Schellenberger Isabelle,Schwanitz Georg,Schenkel Viktoria,Bethke Norma,Hülso Claudia,Dieckmann Sebastian,Peiser Christian,Kurth Florian,Corman Victor Max,Sander Leif Erik,
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveto assess reactogenicity and immunogenicity of heterologous prime-boost immunisations of ChAdOx1-nCoV19 (Vaxzevria, ChAdOx) followed by BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, BNT) compared to homologous BNT/BNT immunisation.Designprospective, observational cohort study.Settingunicenter study in a cohort of health care workers at a tertiary care center in Berlin, Germany.Participants340 health care workers immunised between 27 December 2020 and 21 May 2021 at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, GermanyMain outcome measuresthe main outcomes were reactogenicity assessed on days one, three, five and seven post prime and boost vaccination, and immunogenicity measured by serum SARS-CoV-2 full spike-, spike S1-, and spike RBD-IgG, virus neutralisation capacity, anti-S1-IgG avidity, and T cell reactivity measured by Interferon gamma release assay at 3-4 weeks post prime and boost immunisation.ResultsHeterologous ChAdOx/BNT booster vaccination was overall well-tolerated and reactogenicity was largely comparable to homologous BNT/BNT vaccination. Systemic reactions were most frequent after prime immunisation with ChAdOx (86%, 95CI: 79-91), and less frequent after homologous BNT/BNT (65%, 95CI: 56-72), or heterologous ChAdOx/BNT booster vaccination (48%, 95CI: 36-59). Serum antibody responses and T cell reactivity were strongly increased after both homologous and heterologous boost, and immunogenicity was overall robust, and comparable between both regimens in this cohort, with slightly increased S1-IgG avidity and T cell responses following heterologous booster immunisation.ConclusionsEvidence of rare thrombotic events associated with ChAdOx has led to recommendation of a heterologous booster with mRNA vaccines for certain age groups in several European countries, despite a lack of robust safety and immunogenicity data for this vaccine regimen. This interim analysis provides evidence that the currently recommended heterologous ChAdOx/BNT immunisation regimen with 10-12 week vaccine intervals is well tolerated and slightly more immunogenic compared to homologous BNT/BNT vaccination with three week vaccine intervals. Heterologous prime-boost immunisation for COVID-19 may be generally applicable to optimise logistics and improve immunogenicity and to mitigate potential intermittent supply shortages for individual vaccines.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory