Shared representations between seeing and feeling touch in people with high tactile empathy

Author:

Smit S.ORCID,Moerel D.ORCID,Zopf R.ORCID,Rich A.N.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractSimulation theories propose that tactile empathy arises when seeing someone else being touched triggers corresponding representations of being touched. Prior electroencephalography (EEG) findings show that feeling touch while simultaneously seeing touch (versus seeing a no-touch stimulus) modulates early somatosensory responses. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that seeing touch increases somatosensory cortical activation. These findings have been taken to suggest that when we see someone being touched, we simulate that touch in our sensory systems. The overlap between somatosensory activation when seeing and feeling touch differs between individuals, potentially underpinning variation in tactile empathy. Increases in amplitude (EEG) or cerebral blood flow response (fMRI), however, are limited in that they cannot test for the information contained in the neural signal: seeing touch may not activate the same information as feeling touch. Here, we use time-resolved multivariate pattern analysis on whole-brain EEG data from people with high and low tactile empathy to test whether seen touch evokes similar representations to the first-hand experience of touch. Participants felt touch to the fingers (tactiletrials) or watched carefully matched videos of touch to another person’s fingers (visualtrials). In both groups, EEG was sufficiently sensitive to allow decoding of touch location (little finger vs. thumb) on tactile trials. Only in individuals who reported feeling touch when watching videos of touch (high tactile empathy) could a classifier trained ontactiletrials distinguish touch location onvisualtrials. This demonstrates that, for these people, there is similarity between the neural pattern when seeing touch and feeling that same touch. The timecourse of this overlap shows that seeing touch evokes similar representations tolater stagesof tactile processing. Therefore, while simulation may underlie tactile empathy, our findings suggest this involves abstract high-level processes rather than early low-level processes.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3