Parameter-dependent shift from rational to irrational decisions in mice

Author:

Schneider Nathan A.ORCID,Ballintyn BenjaminORCID,Katz DonaldORCID,Lisman JohnORCID,Pi Hyun-JaeORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the classical view of economic choices, subjects make rational decisions evaluating the costs and benefits of options in order to maximize their overall income. Nonetheless, subjects often fail to reach optimal outcomes. The overt value of an option drives the direction of decisions, but covert factors such as emotion and sunk cost are thought to drive the observed deviations from optimality. Many questions remain to be answered as to 1) which contexts contribute the most to deviation from an optimal solution; and 2) the extent of these effects. In order to tackle these questions, we devised a decision-making task for mice, in which cost and benefit parameters could be independently and flexibly adjusted and for which a tractable optimal solution was known. Comparing mouse behavior with this optimal solution across parameter settings revealed that the factor most strongly contributing to suboptimality was the cost parameter. The quantification of sunk cost, a covert factor implicated in our task design, revealed it as another contributor to suboptimality. In one condition where the large reward option was particularly unattractive and the small reward cost was low, the sunk cost effect and the cost-led suboptimality almost vanished. In this regime and this regime only, mice could be viewed as close to rational. Taken together, our findings support a model whereby parallel neural circuits independently activate and modulate multiple valuation algorithms, and suggest that “rationality” is a task-specific construct even in mice.Significant StatementIrrational factors in economic decision-making often cause significant deviation from optimal outcomes. By devising a flexible economic choice behavior for mice and comparing their behavior with an optimal solution, we investigated overt and covert factors that contributed to suboptimal outcomes and quantified the deviation from optimality. This investigation identified regimes where mice could be viewed as rational or irrational depending upon the parameters in the same task. These findings may provide a platform to investigate biological substrates underlying rational and irrational decision factors.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference41 articles.

1. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem

2. G. Becker , The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978).

3. D. W. Stephens , J. R. Krebs , Foraging theory. Monographs in behavior and ecology (Princeton Academic Press, 1985).

4. R. S. B. Sutton , A. G., Reinforcement lerning: an introduction (A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, 1998).

5. M. Friedman , Essays in Positive Economics. (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1953).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3