Author:
Abu-Ashour Waseem,Emil Sherif,Poenaru Dan
Abstract
AbstractPurposeData science approaches personalizing pediatric appendicitis management are hampered by small datasets and unstructured electronic medical records (EMR). Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots based on large language models (LLMs) can structure free-text EMR data. Here we compare data extraction quality between ChatGPT-4 and human data collectors.MethodsTo train AI models to grade pediatric appendicitis preoperatively, several data collectors (medical students and research assistants) extracted detailed preoperative and operative data from 2100 children operated for acute appendicitis between 2014-2021. Collectors were trained and certified for the task based on satisfactory Kappa scores. ChatGPT-4 was prompted to structure free text from 103 random anonymized ultrasound and operative records in the dataset using the set variables and coding options, and to estimate the Pediatric Appendicitis Grade (PAG) from the operative report. A pediatric surgeon then adjudicated all data, identifying errors in each method.ResultsWithin the 44 ultrasound (42.7%) and 32 operative reports (31.1%) discordant in at least one field, 98% of the errors were found in the manual data extraction. The PAG was erroneously assigned manually in 29 patients (28.2%), and by ChatGPT-4 in 3 (2.9%). Across datasets, the use of the AI chatbot was able to avoid misclassification in 59.2% of the records including both reports and extracted data approx. 100x faster than manually.ConclusionAn AI chatbot significantly outperformed manual data extraction in accuracy for ultrasound and operative reports, and correctly assigned the PAG score. While wider validation is required and data safety concerns must be fully addressed, these novel AI tools show significant promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of research data collection.Highlights1. What is known about this topic?AI chatbots have several benefits and implications including healthcare uses.2. What new information is contained in this article?AI chatbot was proven to be more accurate when compared to human data extraction.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献