Abstract
AbstractThe lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), a retinotopic relay center where visual inputs from the retina are processed and relayed to the visual cortex, has been proposed as a potential target for artificial vision. At present, it is unknown whether optogenetic LGN stimulation is sufficient to elicit behaviorally relevant percepts and the properties of LGN neural responses relevant for artificial vision have not been thoroughly characterized. Here, we demonstrate that tree shrews pretrained on a visual detection task can detect optogenetic LGN activation using an AAV2-CamKIIα-ChR2 construct and readily generalize from visual to optogenetic detection. We also characterize how amplitude and frequency of optogenetic stimulation affect behavioral performance. Given the importance of temporal stimulation parameters, we also study tree shrew behavioral ability to discriminate among pairs of visual flicker frequencies and demonstrate performance transfer among related discrimination problems as well as limitations. Neural recordings in LGN and primary visual cortex (V1) examining two flicker discriminations reveal that while LGN neurons multiplex information about temporal stimulation discriminations, V1 neurons explicitly encode information about one or the other discriminations but not both. Our findings confirm the LGN as a potential target for visual prosthetics and introduce a distinction in stimulus encoding between thalamic and cortical representations that could be of fundamental importance in artificial vision.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference68 articles.
1. Bourne, R. R. A. et al. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health 9, (2021).
2. Roska, B. & Sahel, J. A. Restoring vision. Nature vol. 557 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0076-4 (2018).
3. Mills, J. O. , Jalil, A. & Stanga, P. E. Electronic retinal implants and artificial vision: Journey and present. Eye (Basingstoke) 31, (2017).
4. Ho, A. C. et al. Long-Term Results from an Epiretinal Prosthesis to Restore Sight to the Blind. Ophthalmology 122, (2015).
5. Erickson-Davis, C. & Korzybska, H. What do blind people ‘see’ with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users. PLoS One 16, (2021).