Unipolar voltage for better characterizing left atrium substrates: Comparing the predictive efficacy for recurrence post atrial fibrillation ablation in a post-hoc analysis of STABLE-SR-III

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIntracardiac mapping has become a prevalent technique for assessing cardiac fibrosis. While bipolar recording is universally acknowledged as an indicator of cardiomyocyte activation, unipolar recording has emerged as an alternative technique due to its advantage of providing a wider field of view. This study aims to compare the efficacy of unipolar voltage (UV) versus bipolar voltage (BV) in predicting recurrence in elderly atrial fibrillation patients.MethodsIn Substrate Ablation in the Left Atrium during Sinus Rhythm Trial III, 414 patients were enrolled in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Of them, 375 patients who completed the follow-up with preserved mapping data were included in the analysis. For each patient, the mean UV and BV was obtained from the electrograms sampled in left atrium (LA).ResultsBoth low UV and BV of LA had significant associations with the long-term recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa). At the same time, only mean UV was independently associated with the outcome. The model by UV with ablation feature had higher discriminatory power to predict ATa recurrence compared with BV model (AUC: 0.858 vs 0.757, P<0.001). Decision curve analysis demonstrates that UV model provides larger net benefit across the range of reasonable threshold probabilities between 0% and 70% compared with BV model between 0% and 45%. In subgroup analysis, UV reveals more powerful predictive efficacy compared with BV, with the AUC 0.843 vs. 0.751 (P=0.0008) in CPVI alone cohort and 0.882 vs. 0.750 (P=0.0004) in CPVI plus cohort, respectively.ConclusionUV exhibits a higher efficacy for predicting long-term ATa recurrence after ablation compared with BV in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. The superiority exists regardless of whether the patient accepts substrate modification. The outcome suggests that unipolar recording may better characterize LA fibrosis by capturing more comprehensive transmural features than bipolar signals.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov; URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier:NCT03462628Clinical perspectiveWhat’s knownAtrial fibrosis represents a central pathophysiological feature and has been correlated with complications and resistance to drug and ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation. Evaluating the degree of fibrosis holds paramount clinical importance.Contact intracardiac mapping stands out as a common method for assessing fibrosis. The amplitude of bipolar electrogram signifies the activation of viable cardiomyocytes. Moreover, the decline in amplitude of bipolar voltage has been confirmed to be associated with the long-term recurrence after ablation.What the study addsIn comparison to bipolar voltage, endocardial mean unipolar voltage of left atrium exhibits a higher efficacy for predicting recurrence after ablation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.The superiority predictive ability of unipolar mapping suggests its advantage of providing a broader, more penetrative field of view, enabling the identification of arrhythmogenic substrates in deeper layers of the atrium.