Indexing Healthcare Access and Quality for Surgically Amenable Conditions: A Global Analysis of 204 Countries and Territories from 1990 to 2019

Author:

Zadey SiddheshORCID,Smith Emily R.,Staton Catherine A.,Fitzgerald Tamara N.,Nickenig Vissoci Joao Ricardo

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionBuilding on past frameworks, our aim was to systematically analyze the healthcare access and quality (HAQ) index for surgically treatable conditions, its progress over time, and the gap compared to non-surgical HAQ across 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019.MethodsData was obtained from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. Of the 32 conditions with preventable mortality included in the HAQ index, 14 were considered surgically treatable following an existing framework. We used mortality-to-incidence ratios and risk-standardized death rates. An easily interpretable, computable, and partially compensatory composite index ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) was constructed using the adjusted Mazziotta Pareto index methodology. The indicators were scaled by min-max scaling, aggregated using arithmetic mean, and the aggregate was penalized for imbalance using a variance term. Similarly, a non-surgical HAQ index was calculated, including the 18 remaining conditions. To track progress over time, relative change was calculated as the ratio of surgical HAQ in 2019 to that in 1990. Further, the relative gap in 2019 was calculated as the surgical-to-non-surgical HAQ ratio. Ratio values >1 depicted improvement over time or better performing surgical systems.ResultsIn 2019, surgical HAQ varied from 18.00 for the Central African Republic to 98.25 for Canada. The surgical HAQ showed the greatest relative change for Ethiopia (2019:1990 ratio=3.88), while Zimbabwe saw a slight worsening (ratio=0.92). In 2019, Mauritius had the largest surgical-to-non-surgical HAQ ratio of 1.16, while the surgical HAQ lagged behind its non-surgical HAQ for the Central African Republic (ratio=0.44).ConclusionThe presented index and comprehensive global analysis are valuable for global assessments, policymaking, and advocacy for investing in surgical systems.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3