Tumor suppressor heterozygosity and homologous recombination deficiency mediate resistance to front-line therapy in breast cancer
Author:
Safonov Anton, Marra Antonio, Bandlamudi Chaitanya, O’Leary Ben, Wubbenhorst Bradley, Ferraro Emanuela, Moiso Enrico, Lee Minna, An Julia, Donoghue Mark T.A., Will Marie, Pareja Fresia, Nizialek Emily, Lukashchuk Natalia, Sofianopoulou Eleni, Liu Yuan, Huang Xin, Ahmed Mehnaj, Mehine Miika M., Ross Dara, Mandelker Diana, Ladanyi Marc, Schultz Nikolaus, Berger Michael F., Scaltriti Maurizio, Reis-Filho Jorge S., Li Bob T., Offit Ken, Norton Larry, Shen Ronglai, Shah Sohrab, Maxwell Kara N., Couch Fergus, Domchek Susan M., Solit David B., Nathanson Katherine L., Robson Mark E., Turner Nicholas C., Chandarlapaty SaratORCID, Razavi Pedram
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe co-occurrence of germline and somatic oncogenic alterations is frequently observed in breast cancer, but their combined biologic and clinical significance has not been evaluated. To assess the role of germline-somatic interactions on outcomes in routine practice, we developed an integrated clinicogenomic pipeline to analyze the genomes of over 4,500 patients with breast cancer. We find that germline (g)BRCA2-associated tumors are enriched forRB1loss-of-function mutations and manifest poor outcomes on standard-of-care, front-line CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) combinations. Amongst these tumors, gBRCA2-related homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) as well as baselineRB1LOH status promote acquisition ofRB1loss-of- function mutations under the selective pressure of CDK4/6i, causing therapy resistance. These findings suggest an alternative therapeutic strategy using sequential targeting of HRD in gBRCA-associated breast cancers through PARP inhibitorsprior toCDK4/6i therapy to intercept deleteriousRB1-loss trajectories and thus suppress the emergence of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance. More broadly, our findings demonstrate how germline-somatic driven genomic configurations shape response to systemic therapy and can be exploited therapeutically as part of biomarker-directed clinical strategies.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference48 articles.
1. Garber, J. E. & Offit, K . Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23, (2005). 2. Rahman, N . Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes. Nature 505, (2014). 3. Antoniou, A. et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: A combined analysis of 22 studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, (2003). 4. Kamieniak, M. M. et al. DNA copy number profiling reveals extensive genomic loss in hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 ovarian carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer 108, (2013). 5. Stefansson, O. A. et al. Genomic profiling of breast tumours in relation to BRCA abnormalities and phenotypes. Breast Cancer Res. 11, (2009).
|
|