Performance of GPT-4 on the American College of Radiology In-Service Examination

Author:

Payne David L.ORCID,Purohit Kush,Borrero Walter Morales,Chung Katherine,Hao Max,Mpoy Mutshipay,Jin Michael,Prasanna PrateekORCID,Hill VirginiaORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectivesNo study has evaluated the ability of ChatGPT-4 to answer image-rich diagnostic radiology board exam questions or assessed for model drift in GPT-4’s image interpretation abilities. In our study we evaluate GPT-4’s performance on the American College of Radiology (ACR) 2022 Diagnostic Radiology In-Training Examination (DXIT).MethodsQuestions were sequentially input into GPT-4 with a standardized prompt. Each answer was recorded and overall accuracy was calculated, as was logic-adjusted accuracy, and accuracy on image-based questions. This experiment was repeated several months later to assess for model drift.ResultsGPT-4 achieved 58.5% overall accuracy, lower than the PGY-3 average (61.9%) but higher than the PGY-2 average (52.8%). Adjusted accuracy was 52.8%. GPT-4 showed significantly higher (p = 0.012) confidence for correct answers (87.1%) compared to incorrect (84.0%). Performance on image-based questions was notably poorer (p < 0.001) at 45.4% compared to text-only questions (80.0%), with adjusted accuracy for image questions of 36.4%.When the questions were repeated, GPT-4 chose a different answer 25.5% of the time and there was a small but insignificant decrease in accuracy.DiscussionGPT-4 performed between PGY-2 and PGY-3 levels on the 2022 DXIT, but significantly poorer on image-based questions, and with large variability in answer choices across time points. This study underscores the potential and risks of using minimally-prompted general AI models in interpreting radiologic images as a diagnostic tool. Implementers of general AI radiology systems should exercise caution given the possibility of spurious yet confident responses.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference24 articles.

1. ChatGPT. Accessed February 3, 2024. https://chat.openai.com

2. Shewale R. ChatGPT Statistics — User Demographics (February 2024). Published January 12, 2024. Accessed February 3, 2024. https://www.demandsage.com/chatgpt-statistics/

3. GPT-4. Accessed February 3, 2024. https://openai.com/research/gpt-4

4. Health C for D and R. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Enabled Medical Devices. FDA. Published online December 6, 2023. Accessed February 4, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-aiml-enabled-medical-devices

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3