Left atrial substrate characterization based on bipolar voltage electrograms acquired with multipolar, focal and mini-electrode catheters– the CHAZE-Substrate study

Author:

Knecht SvenORCID,Schlageter Vincent,Badertscher PatrickORCID,Krisai PhilippORCID,Jousset FlorianORCID,Spies FlorianORCID,Küffer ThomasORCID,Madaffari AntonioORCID,Schaer Beat,Osswald StefanORCID,Sticherling ChristianORCID,Kühne MichaelORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBipolar voltage (BV) electrograms for left atrial (LA) substrate characterization depend on catheter design and electrode configuration. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between the BV amplitude (BVA) using four different catheters and to identify their specific LA cutoffs for scar and healthy tissue.MethodsConsecutive high-resolution electroanatomic mapping was performed using a multipolar Orion catheter (Orion-map), a duo-decapolar variable circular mapping catheter (Lasso-Map) and an irrigated focal ablation catheter with minielectrodes (Mifi-map). Virtual remapping using the Mifi-map was performed with a 4.5 mm tip-size electrode configuration (Nav-map). BVAs were compared in voxels of 3×3×3 mm3. The equivalent BVA cutoff for every catheter was calculated for established reference cutoff values of 0.1 mV, 0.2 mV, 0.5 mV, 1.0 mV, and 1.5 mV.ResultsWe analyzed 25 patients (72% men, age 68±15 years). For scar tissue, a 0.5 mV cutoff using the Nav corresponds to a lower cutoff of 0.35 mV for the Orion and of 0.48 mV for the Lasso. Accordingly, a 0.2 mV cutoff corresponds to a cutoff of 0.09 mV for the Orion and of 0.14 mV for the Lasso. For a healthy tissue cutoff at 1.5 mV, a larger BVA cutoff for the small electrodes of the Orion and the Lasso was determined of 1.68 mV and 2.21 mV, respectively.ConclusionsWhen measuring LA BVA in scar and healthy tissue, relevant differences were seen between focal, multielectrode and mini-electrode catheters. Adapted cutoffs for scar and healthy tissue are required.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3