Preparation for cardiac procedures: identifying gaps between outpatients’ views and experiences of patient-centred care

Author:

Fakes KristyORCID,Williams Trent,Collins Nicholas,Boyle Andrew,Sverdlov Aaron LORCID,Boyes Allison,Sanson-Fisher Rob

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundTo examine the delivery of patient-centred care and identify any gaps in care perceived as essential by patients; this study examined outpatients’: 1) views on what characterises essential care and 2) experiences of care received, in relation to cardiac catheterisation and subsequent cardiovascular procedures.MethodsA cross-sectional descriptive study was undertaken. Surveys were posted to outpatients who had undergone elective cardiac catheterisation in the prior six months at an Australian tertiary public hospital. Participants completed a 65-item survey to determine: a) aspects of care they perceive as essential for a healthcare team to provide to patients receiving care for a cardiac condition (Important Care Survey); or b) their actual care received (Actual Care Survey). Numbers and percentages were used to calculate the most frequently identified essential care items by patients; and the experiences of care received. Items rated as either ‘Essential’ or ‘Very important’ by at least 80% of participants were determined, reflecting patient endorsement of the importance of the component of care. A gap in patient-centred care was identified as being any item that was endorsed as essential/very important by 80% or more of participants but reported as received by less than 80% of participants.ResultsOf 582 eligible patients, 264 (45%) returned a completed survey. 43/65 items were endorsed by over 80% of participants as essential/very important. Of those, for 22 items, less than 80% of respondents reported the care as received. Gaps were identified in relation to GP consultation (3 items), preparation (4 items), having the procedure (2 items), follow-up care (1 item), subsequent decision making for treatment (4 items), prognosis (6 items) and post-treatment follow-up (1 item).ConclusionsAreas were identified where actual care fell short of patients’ perceptions of essential care, particularly general practitioner involvement, the referral process and information on patient prognosis.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference32 articles.

1. Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review;Glob J Health Sci,2012

2. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2001. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10027&page=39.

3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Patient-centred care: Improving quality and safety through partnerships with patients and consumers. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2011.

4. Patient-centred care as an approach to improving health care in Australia;Collegian,2018

5. OECD. Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3