Abstract
Background: Anterior Open Bite (AOB) is a malocclusion condition characterized by the absence of contact between the upper and lower anterior teeth, resulting from oral bad habits for a long time or abnormalities in skeletal patterns. AOB leads a lack of confidence in children because of the difficulty for lip sealing and the unclear pronunciation function. AOB occurs in children and continues into adulthood so it needs to be treated early on at the age of growth and development. One method of treating AOB is Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy (OMT) which is a method to improve the stability of the stomatognatic system by involving the exercise of the facial and neck muscles.
Aim: Literature Review (LR) writing aims to find out the effectiveness of OMT in the case of AOB children, how the treatment is carried out and the problems that occur during OMT.
Mini-Review: OMT increases the activity of the masseter and buccinator muscles, and decreases the contraction of the lip muscles that the lips may seal. OMT is able to increase the ability to hold the tongue to stay in contact with the palate so there is no obstacle to the eruption of the lower insisivus tooth and AOB can be corrected. Results: Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy (OMT) is effective for the correction of a child's Anterior Open Bite (AOB) as a combination therapy with the use of orthodontic tools or myofunctional equipment, especially in children older than 12 years of age and craniofacial deformity has occurred.
Publisher
Mapsci Digital Publisher OPC Pvt. Ltd.
Reference61 articles.
1. 1. Sutardjo IRS. Considerations and Problems of Early Use of Orthodontic Interseptic Devices in Developmental Children. J Stomatognatic. Jember University. 2011;8(1):1-10.
2. 2. Araújo EA, Buschang PH. Recognizing and correcting developing malocclusions: a problem-oriented approach to orthodontics. John Wiley & Sons. 2016. CrossRef
3. 3. Almeida MR, Almeida RR, Oltramari-Navarro PV, Conti AC, Navarro RD, Camacho JG. Early treatment of Class III malocclusion: 10-year clinical follow-up. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(4):431-9. PubMed | CrossRef
4. 4. Achmad H, Faizah N. M--Effect of Orthodontic Facemask as a Treatment for Children in Growth and Development Period: A Systematic Review.Ann Romanian Soc Cell Biol. 2021:1658-72.
5. 5. Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A, Dyer F, Littlewood S, Mattick R, et al. Early Class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, twoarm parallel randomized, controlled trial. J Orthod. 2016;43(3):164-75. PubMed | CrossRef