Interaction between the Judicial Institutions (on the example of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights)

Author:

Entin M. L.1ORCID,Tsveyba N. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The interaction of international judicial institutions in the context of cross-judicial references is one of the most important mechanisms for the development of law. The appearance of a large number of competing international judicial institutions and the rapid development of public relations have led to the formation of a stable practice of such interaction. On the European continent, cross-citation interaction can be most clearly seen in the relationship between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. In the context of the phenomena of cross-judicial references, the author points out their high importance for the development of the institution of protection of human rights and freedoms in Europe.MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study uses the works of both Russian and foreign specialists in the field of European law, as well as analyses of the European Union and Council of Europe legal acts. General scientific methods of knowledge analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction were used during the study. Special legal methods formal-legal, technical-legal, the method of legal analogy, as well as the comparative legal method were also used in the work.RESEARCH RESULTS. The analysis of the current practice of cross-citation between the two judicial bodies clearly demonstrates the high relevance of cross-citation in terms of the development and integration of the human rights law in the European region. The author concludes that cross-citation between the two courts ultimately significantly improves the level and effectiveness of the protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms in Europe, contributing to an active convergence of judicial positions and a harmonisation of approaches taken by the courts in resolving similar cases.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. As part of the research, the author analyzes the process and mechanisms of interaction between the European Union Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. Examined the case law of the two judicial bodies in order to determine the direction of their interaction. Explored the characteristic and specific features of cross-citation carried out by the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. Based on the results of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that cross-citation carried out by the EU Court of Justice and the ECtHR contributes to the harmonization of European norms in the field of human rights protection and preserves the unity of the European legal system.

Publisher

MGIMO University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Chaika K.L. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye podkhody v praktike Suda Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [International Legal Approaches in the Practice of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union]. – Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2018. No. 11. P. 138-151. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_11_14

2. Danilina M.V. Prioritetnye napravleniya vzaimodeistviya Soveta Evropy, evropeiskogo Soyuza i Rossiiskoi federatsii v sfere zashchity prav cheloveka i ikh finansirovanie [Priority areas of interaction between the Council of Europe, the European Union and the Russian Federation in the field of human rights protection and their financing]. – Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. 2011. No. 13. P. 71-79. (In Russ.)

3. Deftou M.-L. ‘The Road to the EU’s Accession to the ECHR: Reshaping the ECtHR-CJEU Judicial Interaction in Cases of “Unwanted Migration”?. – International Community Law Review. 2022. Vol. 24. Issue 4. P. 377-396. DOI: 10.1163/18719732-bja10090.

4. Entin K.V. Pravo Evropeiskogo Soyuza skvoz' prizmu praktiki Suda Evropeiskogo Soyuza: monografiya [Law of the European Union through the prism of the practice of the Court of the European Union: a monograph]. Moscow: Statut Publ. 2020. 324 p. (In Russ.)

5. Entin L.M., Voinikov V.V. Torkunova E.A. Novyi etap v institutsional'no-pravovom obustroistve prostranstva svobody, bezopasnosti i pravosudiya ES [The New Stage of Institutional and Legal Foundation of the EU Area of Freedom, Security and Justice]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2018. No. 2. P. 102-114. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-102-114

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3