Development of university research potential as the basis of competitive quality of higher education in the United States: experience for Ukraine

Author:

Lugovyi VolodymyrORCID,Slyusarenko OlenaORCID,Talanova ZhannetaORCID

Abstract

The development of University research potential (URP) in the USA during 1950-2020 in view of achieving competitive quality of higher education is analysed in the article. The national deterministic context and components of this potential by the types of activity (educational, research) and by the resources (personnel, financial, organizational) as well as component impact on the highest excellence quality of education (according to the criteria of the Academic Ranking of World Universities, ARWU) are identified. It is proved that the context of URP development is dichotomous and consists of national spheres of education and research. This assertion corresponds to the duality of higher education (as an integrated intersection of education and research) and the composition and structure of higher education mission (list of interrelated keywords and the order of their priority: education, research, creativity / innovation). It is substantiated that URP is first actualized within study programmes of the highest level of complexity (Master's, PhD and Postdoctoral), research activity of academic staff (especially professors) and research organizations associated with Universities (institutes, centres, laboratories, clinics). This reasoning conforms to the concept and criteria for research and doctoral Universities in line with the Carnegie Classification. These components are integrated into the educational process to varying degrees, so they have a different impact on the quality of education. For the first 30 top US Universities, there is no probable correlation between ranking achievements and the amount of research and developments (R&D) funding as well as the number of researchers in institutions. Instead, such correlation is strong for the number of Postdoctorates in an institution. In general, there is a steady trend of downward in the share of the higher education sector within R&D performance in the US that amounted to 12.0 % in 2019. Although scale of higher education sector share is still growing quantitatively and is the basis for modernizing education content. At the same time, Master's, PhD and Postdoctoral programmes are spreading at a significant pace. In the 1959/60 academic year, the ratio of the number of awarded Bachelor's, Master's and PhD degrees was 1 : 27 : 7.5, in 2018/19 – 1 : 41 : 9.3 under multiple times increased graduation. Between 1979 and 2019, the number of Postdoctorates increased 3.7 times. Salaries of academic staff, especially professors, are increased, academic staff workload is minimized and subject-oriented, a system of permanent employment is proposed, and a modern educational, research, and information infrastructure is created for effective research and research-based education activity. The national context of the development of URP is stably favourable given the increase in the share of GDP for the funding of education institutions in general, higher education institutions in particular, and R&D especially. The corresponding expenditures reached 7.1 %, 3.0 % and 3.1 % GDP and are the largest ones quantitatively in the world. Purposeful and consolidated (federal, business, university, public) support for education and R&D has been and is provided in critical periods of the country's competitive struggle for leadership in an innovatively progressive world. The state of these spheres, in particular higher education, and URP, is systematically examined. The decades of the 1960s of the last century and the twenties of the present century are significant. In the 1960s, the share of GDP for the higher education institutions funding was doubled, the number of awarded Master's degrees was increased almost tripled, and the award of PhD degrees was increased six times to overcome the threat of educational and scientific backwardness. R&D funding reached 2.8 % of GDP, of which 1.9 % came from the federal budget. Funding for Universities’ R&D has increased 3.6 times. The super-powerful public University of California, San Diego (1960), 9 other world-class Universities, and 6 subworld-class Universities according to the ARWU, the National Academy of Engineering (1964), and the National Academy of Education (1965) were established. The characteristics of state, monitoring and development policy of the URP and educational and research context in the US is a guideline for the improvement of Ukrainian Universities.

Publisher

Institute of Higher Education NAES of Ukraine

Reference33 articles.

1. Horoneskul, M. (uklad.). (2009). Tablytsi funktsii ta krytychnykh tochok rozpodiliv. Rozdily: Teoriia ymovirnostei. Matematychna statystyka, Matematychni metody v psykholohii. Kharkiv: UTsZU [Tables of functions and critical distribution points. Sections: Probability theory. Mathematical statistics, Mathematical methods in psychology]. http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/1530/1/Tablici.pdf. (in Ukrainian).

2. Lugovyi, V. & Talanova, Zh. (2016). Oplata pratsi v providnykh universytetakh SShA: dosvid dlia Ukrainy [Salary in US Leading Universities: Experience for Ukraine]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia. Visn. NAPN Ukrainy. 1, 51–57. (in Ukrainian).

3. Lugovyi, V., Slyusarenko, O., & Talanova Zh. (2019). Realizatsiia doslidnytsko-innovatsiinoho potentsialu universytetiv yak nevidiemnoho skladnyka yikh diialnosti [Realization of research and innovation potential of universities as an integral part of their activities]. Nauka ta naukoznavstvo: mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal, 3 (105), 26–45. (in Ukrainian).

4. Lugovyi, V., Slyusarenko, O., & Talanova, Zh. (2020). Reitynhovyi rozpodil ta formulne finansuvannia ukrainskykh universytetiv: problema subiektyvizmu i nedoviry [Ranking distribution and formula funding of Ukrainian Universities: the problem of subjectivism and mistrust]. Universytety i liderstvo: mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal, 2 (10), 35–69. https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2020-10-2-35-69. (in Ukrainian).

5. Lugovyi, V., Slyusarenko, O., & Talanova, Zh. (2020a). Monitorynh, motyvatsiia, mobilizatsiia zadlia konkurentospromozhnosti universytetiv Ukrainy: mekhanizmy realizatsii [Monitoring, motivation, mobilization for the competitiveness of Ukraine universities: mechanisms of realization]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pedahohichnykh nauk Ukrainy, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.37472/2707-305X-2020-2-2-13-1. (in Ukrainian).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Integration and differentiation of leadership higher education: lessons for Ukraine from the EU, USA and China;International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership;2024-06-30

2. НАУКОВЕ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ПРОЄКТУ «ПРЕЗИДЕНТСЬКИЙ УНІВЕРСИТЕТ»;Herald of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine;2021-06-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3