The role first-day readings play in a three-day schedule of self-monitoring home blood pressure based on prognostic data. VAMPAHICA Study

Author:

Bayó Joan12,Dalfó Antoni1,Barceló Maria A341,Saez Marc341,Roca Carme2,Pallozzi Julia2,Coll-de-Tuero Gabriel145

Affiliation:

1. MEHTARISC Group.  Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Girona, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Girona, Spain

2. CAP El Clot. SAP Litoral. Institut Català de la Salut. Barcelona. Spain

3. Research Group on Statistics, Econometrics and Health (GRECS), University of Girona, Girona, Spain

4. CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain

5. Department of Medical Sciences, University of Girona, Girona, Spain

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND The optimal schedule for self-monitoring home BP (SMHBP) readings is enormously important in the diagnosis of different phenotypes related to hypertension. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic capacity of a three-day SMHBP schedule when using or suppressing the first-day measurements in compiling the results. METHODS A total of 767 newly diagnosed, non-treated patients with no history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were followed for 6.2 years. As a baseline, office BP measurements were taken for all the patients who then went on to follow a three-day SMHBP schedule, taking two readings in the morning and two in the evening. The prognostic calculation was performed with CVD variables. The prognostic capacity of the three-day schedule was evaluated with and without the first-day readings (12 and 8 readings). RESULTS A total of 223 normotensive subjects (NT), 271 subjects with sustained hypertension (SHT) and 184 white-coat hypertensive subjects (WCH) were followed. The distribution of 98 (14.4%) non-fatal CV events during the follow-up was as follows: WCH 21 (11.4%), NT 9 (4.0%) and SHT 68 (25.1%). No statistically significant differences were observed in the risk of CV events (OR) for the two groups of hypertensives, irrespective of the schedule of readings used (SHT with vs without first-day readings: 8.81 (4.28-18.15) vs 8.61 (4.15-17.85) and WCH with vs without first-day readings: 2.71(1.13-6.47) vs 3.40 (1.49-7.78)). CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that first-day readings do not need to be discarded in order to calculate the final value of an SMHBP schedule.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3