Advancing health equity in cancer survivorship research: National Institutes of Health 2017–2022 portfolio review

Author:

Doose Michelle1ORCID,Mollica Michelle A1ORCID,Acevedo Amanda M2,Tesauro Gina2,Gallicchio Lisa3ORCID,Reed Crystal1,Guida Jennifer2ORCID,Maher Molly E4,Srinivasan Shobha5ORCID,Tonorezos Emily1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute , Rockville, MD, USA

2. Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute , Rockville, MD, USA

3. Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute , Rockville, MD, USA

4. Office of Cancer Centers, Office of the Director, National Cancer Institute , Rockville, MD, USA

5. Office of the Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute , Rockville, MD, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Communities and researchers have called for a paradigm shift from describing health disparities to a health equity research agenda that addresses structural drivers. Therefore, we examined whether the cancer survivorship research portfolio has made this shift. Methods We identified grants focused on populations experiencing health disparities from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cancer Survivorship Research Portfolio (N = 724), Fiscal Years 2017–2022. Grant characteristics were abstracted, drivers of health disparities were mapped onto the levels and domains of influence, and opportunities for future research were identified. Results A total of 147 survivorship grants focused on health disparities were identified, of which 73.5% of grants focused on survivors from racial and ethnic minoritized groups, 25.9% living in rural areas, 24.5% socioeconomically disadvantaged, and 2.7% sexual and gender minority groups. Study designs were 51.0% observational; 82.3% of grants measured or intervened on at least 1 individual-level of influence compared to higher levels of influence (32.7% interpersonal, 41.5% institutional and community, and 12.2% societal). Behavioral and health care system domains of influence were commonly represented, especially at the individual level (47.6% and 36.1%, respectively). Less frequently represented was the physical and built environment (12.2%). Conclusions NIH-funded cancer survivorship research on health disparities is still focused on individual level of influence. However, the proportion of grants examining structural and social drivers as well as the mechanisms that drive disparities in health care and health outcomes among cancer survivors have increased over time. Gaps in funded research on specific populations, cancer types, and focus areas of survivorship science were identified and warrant priority.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference66 articles.

1. The concepts and principles of equity and health;Whitehead;Int J Health Serv,1992

2. Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement;Braveman;Annu Rev Public Health,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3