Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes by race and ethnicity: a scoping review

Author:

Hurson Amber N1,Ahearn Thomas U1,Koka Hela1,Jenkins Brittany D123,Harris Alexandra R13,Roberts Sylvia1,Fan Sharon1,Franklin Jamirra3,Butera Gisela4,Keeman Renske5,Jung Audrey Y6,Middha Pooja7,Gierach Gretchen L1,Yang Xiaohong R1ORCID,Chang-Claude Jenny6,Tamimi Rulla M8,Troester Melissa A9,Bandera Elisa V10,Abubakar Mustapha1,Schmidt Marjanka K511,Garcia-Closas Montserrat112ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute , Rockville, MD, USA

2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD, USA

3. Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute , Bethesda, MD, USA

4. National Institutes of Health Library, Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD, USA

5. Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands

6. Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg, Germany

7. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA, USA

8. Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York, NY, USA

9. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, NC, USA

10. Section of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey , New Brunswick, NJ, USA

11. Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden, the Netherlands

12. Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research , London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Breast cancer consists of distinct molecular subtypes. Studies have reported differences in risk factor associations with breast cancer subtypes, especially by tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status, but their consistency across racial and ethnic populations has not been comprehensively evaluated. Methods We conducted a qualitative, scoping literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis, extension for Scoping Reviews to investigate consistencies in associations between 18 breast cancer risk factors (reproductive, anthropometric, lifestyle, and medical history) and risk of ER-defined subtypes in women who self-identify as Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latina, or White. We reviewed publications between January 1, 1990 and July 1, 2022. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence (convincing, suggestive, none, or inconclusive) was determined by expert consensus. Results Publications per risk factor ranged from 14 (benign breast disease history) to 66 (parity). Publications were most abundant for White women, followed by Asian, Black or African American, and Hispanic or Latina women. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence was strongest for parity, followed by age at first birth, postmenopausal body mass index, oral contraceptive use, and estrogen-only and combined menopausal hormone therapy. Evidence was limited for other risk factors. Findings were consistent across racial and ethnic groups, although the strength of evidence varied. Conclusion The literature supports etiologic heterogeneity by ER for some established risk factors that are consistent across race and ethnicity groups. However, in non-White populations evidence is limited. Larger, more comparable data in diverse populations are needed to better characterize breast cancer etiologic heterogeneity.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3