Urine drug testing in the context of opioid analgesic prescribing for chronic pain: a content analysis of U.S. state laws in 2022

Author:

Andraka-Christou Barbara12ORCID,McAvoy Elizabeth3,Gordon Adam J45,Ohama Maggie6,Brach Marilyn7,Taylor Erin A8,Vaiana Mary8,Saloner Brendan9,Stein Bradley D10

Affiliation:

1. School of Global Health Management & Informatics, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32801, United States

2. Department of Internal Medicine (Secondary Joint Appointment), University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32827, United States

3. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University , Bloomington, IN 47405, United States

4. Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System , Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States

5. Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine , Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States

6. The Cardiac and Vascular Institute , Gainesville, FL 32605, United States

7. Trinity College , Hartford, CT 06106, United States

8. RAND Corporation , Santa Monica, CA 90401, United States

9. Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD 21205, United States

10. RAND Corporation , Pittsburgh, PA 15238, United States

Abstract

Abstract Background In response to the opioid crisis, U.S. states have passed laws requiring urine drug testing (UDT) when opioid analgesics are prescribed for chronic pain. We sought to identify state law UDT requirements. Methods We searched NexisUni legal database using terms related to UDT, chronic pain, and opioids. We included laws effective during spring 2022 that required UDT when opioids were prescribed for chronic pain. We performed deductive content analysis, coding laws for mandated UDT frequency, type of clinician and type of payer to whom the law applied, and circumstances under which UDT was mandated. Results We found 32 laws across 13 states that met our inclusion criteria. UDT requirements varied substantially by state, including with regard to the type of clinician to whom the law applied, the mandated frequency of UDT (eg, at initiation/assessment, at least annually, more than once per year), and the circumstances in which UDT was mandated (eg, patient had substance use disorder; dosage/day threshold). Discussion Relatively few states have UDT mandates associated with prescribing opioids as chronic pain treatment. When developing policy indicators for empirical studies, researchers evaluating how UDT policy affects health outcomes must consider the complexity and lack of uniformity of UDT requirements. In addition, even if states mandate UDT, it is unclear whether clinicians understand the best way to use the test results.

Funder

NIH

National Institute on Drug Abuse

RAND Corporation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3