Pre-Outpatient Group Education and Assessment in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review

Author:

Mullins Cormac Francis1ORCID,Bak Braydon2,Moore David3

Affiliation:

1. St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

2. Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland

3. Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

Abstract Background Pre-outpatient interventions in chronic pain have the potential to improve patient self-management earlier in primary or secondary care, which may minimize pain chronicity and negative health outcomes. The literature for this is sparse, and there are no existing systematic reviews on this topic. Methods The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the evidence for pre-outpatient group interventions in chronic pain. Results We identified four studies that looked at this: two randomized control trials, one prospective observational study, and one descriptive study. We identified high-quality evidence that a pre-outpatient group intervention reduces waiting times, moderate-quality evidence that it results in reduced costs per patient, very low-quality evidence that it reduces health care utilization, and very low-quality evidence that it improves service throughput. There were moderate-to-low levels of participant engagement with the initiative, which varied across the included studies. For patient outcome measures, we found no evidence that a pre-outpatient group intervention improves pain intensity, very low-quality evidence that it improves pain-related interference, low-quality evidence that it increases use of pain management strategies and produces high satisfaction levels, low-quality evidence that it improves pain self-efficacy, and no evidence that it improves psychological distress. Conclusions Group interventions before individual appointments have the potential to provide important improvements in service delivery, including improvements in waiting times and cost per patient. Benefits for patient outcome measures are less clear. Clinical heterogeneity and high levels of bias existed in the included studies. Further research is required so that meaningful conclusions can be made about these interventions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3