Communicating uncertainty: contrasting the communication experiences of patients with advanced COPD and incurable lung cancer

Author:

Ngwenya Nothando12ORCID,Crang Clare2,Farquhar Morag3,Rintoul Robert C45,Mahadeva Ravi6,Calvert Lori D7,Murray Scott A8,Barclay Stephen2

Affiliation:

1. Social Science and Research Ethics Department, Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

2. Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

3. School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

4. Department of Oncology, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

5. Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, UK

6. Respiratory Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

7. North West Anglia Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridgeshire, UK

8. Primary Palliative Care Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Due to the uncertain disease trajectory and variable rate of progression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), health care professionals (HCPs) are challenged in explaining what the future may hold for patients compared to those with lung cancer (LC). Support and communication of timely information can significantly improve health outcomes. Objective This study sought to identify factors that impact communication and support and recommend ways to improve patients’ understanding of living with life-threatening illness. Methods Semi-structured interviews with patients with LC (n = 22) and advanced COPD (n = 18), their informal carers (21 LC and 18 COPD) and HCPs (n = 51). Patients were recruited from primary and secondary care in the East of England, UK, during 2010–12. Results Directness and clarity characterized communication in LC, whereas uncertainty and limited explanations predominated in COPD. Discussions on how the disease might impact on decisions and preferences to be made in the future were less common in COPD. Information for LC patients was mainly from hospital clinicians and any information for COPD patients mainly from primary care clinicians. Conclusions The experience of COPD patients could be improved by professionals soon after diagnosis explaining to them the typical pattern of decline in COPD, highlighting the inherent uncertainties about when exacerbations and death may occur. This conversation should lead to planning for the different challenges that the patient and informal carer recognize as most important to them. This contrasts with the ‘breaking bad news’ conversation that oncologists are highly trained to deliver.

Funder

Macmillan Cancer Support

National Institute for Health Research

Cancer Research UK

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3