Effectiveness of brief interventions in primary care for cannabis users aged from 12 to 25 years old: a systematic review

Author:

Chazal Camille1,Roux Charline1,Kinouani Shérazade23,Schuers Matthieu456,Fortin Frédéric7ORCID,Pereira Bruno8ORCID,Blanc Olivier7,Piñol-Domenech Nathalie9,Brousse Georges710,Vorilhon Philippe11,Laporte Catherine7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Practice, Université Clermont Auvergne , Clermont-Ferrand , France

2. Department of General Practice, University of Bordeaux , Bordeaux F-33000 , France

3. University Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team HEALTHY , UMR 1219, Bordeaux , France

4. Department of General Practice, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN , Rouen , France

5. Department of Biomedical Informatics, CHU Rouen , Rouen , France

6. Sorbonne Université, LIMICS U1142 , Paris , France

7. Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal , Clermont-Ferrand , France

8. CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Biostatistics Unit, Direction de la Recherche Clinique , Clermont-Ferrand , France

9. Université Clermont Auvergne, Health Library , Clermont-Ferrand , France

10. CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service of Psychiatry B , Clermont-Ferrand , France

11. Université Clermont Auvergne, UR ACCePPT , Clermont-Ferrand , France

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of brief interventions realized in primary care in reducing cannabis use for adolescents and emerging adults. Methods PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and Central (Cochrane Library) were searched until December 2020. Randomized controlled trials conducted in primary care, concerning in-person brief interventions for non-medical cannabis users aged from 12 to 25 years old were eligible for inclusion. Brief interventions had to last 30 min or less. Patients with comorbid mental health disorder or very specific populations were not included. Results One thousand eighty hundred and fifty-five studies were identified through database searching; only 8 studies involving 2,199 patients were included for qualitative synthesis after double reading and data extraction. Randomized controlled trials selected were heterogeneous regarding screening tools, initial levels of cannabis use and cannabis outcomes measures. Brief interventions were all based on motivational interviewing techniques or personalized feedback. Seven studies consisted in a single session of brief intervention. Six studies involved also other substance users. No significant reduction of cannabis use after brief intervention was found for most studies, especially in the long term. A trend of decreased cannabis consequences, such as negative psychosocial repercussions, perception of cannabis use by peers, or driving under the influence of cannabis, was reported. Conclusion The current state of knowledge does not allow us to say that the brief intervention is effective in reducing cannabis use among adolescents in primary care. We found a mild positive effect on cannabis consequences after brief intervention. Mixed qualitative and quantitative studies are need to better evaluate the impact of brief intervention and his faisability. PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews): n° CRD42016033080.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

Reference47 articles.

1. A systematic review of the relationship between high school dropout and substance use.;Townsend;Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev,2007

2. Risks associated with the non-medicinal use of cannabis.;Hoch;Dtsch Arztebl Int,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3