A scoping review of evidence-based guidance and guidelines published by general practice professional organizations

Author:

O’Brien Emer1ORCID,Duffy Seamus1,Harkins Velma2,Smith Susan M13ORCID,O’Herlihy Noirin2ORCID,Walsh Aisling4ORCID,Clyne Barbara1ORCID,Wallace Emma15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences , Dublin , Ireland

2. Irish College of General Practitioners , Dublin , Ireland

3. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Dublin , Dublin   Ireland

4. Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences , Dublin , Ireland

5. Department of General Practice, University College Cork , Cork , Ireland

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) need robust, up-to-date evidence to deliver high-quality patient care. There is limited literature regarding the role of international GP professional organizations in developing and publishing clinical guidelines to support GPs clinical decision making.ObjectiveTo identify evidence-based guidance and clinical guidelines produced by GP professional organizations and summarize their content, structure, and methods of development and dissemination.MethodsScoping review of GP professional organizations following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Four databases were searched and a grey literature search was conducted. Studies were included if they were: (i) evidence-based guidance documents or clinical guidelines produced de novo by a national GP professional organization, (ii) developed to support GPs clinical care, and (iii) published in the last 10 years. GP professional organizations were contacted to provide supplementary information. A narrative synthesis was performed.ResultsSix GP professional organizations and 60 guidelines were included. The most common de novo guideline topics were mental health, cardiovascular disease, neurology, pregnancy and women’s health and preventive care. All guidelines were developed using a standard evidence-synthesis method. All included documents were disseminated through downloadable pdfs and peer review publications. GP professional organizations indicated that they generally collaborate with or endorse guidelines developed by national or international guideline producing bodies.ConclusionThe findings of this scoping review provide an overview of de novo guideline development by GP professional organizations and can support collaboration between GP organizations worldwide thus reducing duplication of effort, facilitating reproducibility, and identifying areas of standardization.Protocol registrationOpen Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JXQ26.

Funder

Irish College of General Practitioners

Health Research Board of Ireland Applied Partnership

HRB Emerging Investigators Award

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

Reference117 articles.

1. A new definition of primary care;Vanselow;JAMA,1995

2. Gatekeeping revisited—protecting patients from overtreatment;Franks;N Engl J Med,1992

3. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare;Stiggelbout;BMJ,2012

4. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals;Légaré;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3