Comparing Artificial Intelligence Guided Image Assessment to Current Methods of Burn Assessment

Author:

Lee Justin J1ORCID,Abdolahnejad Mahla2ORCID,Morzycki Alexander1ORCID,Freeman Tara1ORCID,Chan Hannah2ORCID,Hong Collin2ORCID,Joshi Rakesh2ORCID,Wong Joshua N1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Alberta Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, , Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7 , Canada

2. Skinopathy Inc. , Toronto, Ontario, M2N1N5 , Canada

Abstract

Abstract Appropriate identification of burn depth and size is paramount. Despite the development of burn depth assessment aids [eg, laser Doppler imaging (LDI)], clinical assessment, which assesses partial-thickness burn depth with 67% accuracy, currently remains the most consistent standard of practice. We sought to develop an image-based artificial intelligence system that predicts burn severity and wound margins for use as a triaging tool in thermal injury management. Modified EfficientNet architecture trained by 1684 mobile-device-captured images of different burn depths was previously used to create a convoluted neural network (CNN). The CNN was modified to a novel boundary attention mapping (BAM) algorithm using elements of saliency mapping, which was used to recognize the boundaries of burns. For validation, 144 patient charts that included clinical assessment, burn location, total body surface area, and LDI assessment were retrieved for a retrospective study. The clinical images underwent CNN-BAM assessment and were directly compared with the LDI assessment. CNN using a 4-level burn severity classification achieved an accuracy of 85% (micro/macro-averaged receiver operating characteristic scores). The CNN-BAM system can successfully highlight burns from surrounding tissue with high confidence. CNN-BAM burn area segmentations attained a 91.6% accuracy, 78.2% sensitivity, and 93.4% specificity, when compared to LDI methodology. Results comparing the CNN-BAM outputs to clinical and LDI assessments have shown a high degree of correlation between the CNN-BAM burn severity predictions to those extrapolated from LDI healing potential (66% agreement). CNN-BAM algorithm gives equivalent burn-depth detection accuracy as LDI with a more economical and accessible application when embedded in a mobile device.

Funder

National Research Council IRAP

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference21 articles.

1. Burn wound healing: clinical complications, medical care, treatment, and dressing types: the current state of knowledge for clinical practice;Markiewicz-Gospodarek;Int J Environ Res Public Health,2022

2. Scar and contracture: biological principles;Kwan;Hand Clin,2009

3. A systematic review on classification, identification, and healing process of burn wound healing;Abazari;Int J Low Extrem Wounds,2022

4. Prevention and management of scarring after thermal injury;Wong;Plast Aesthet Res,2021

5. Important developments in burn care;Zuo;Plast Reconstr Surg,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3