Affiliation:
1. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yüzüncü Yıl University , Van 65080 , Turkey
2. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mardin Artuklu University , Mardin 47200 , Turkey
3. Department of Microbiology, Cengiz Gökçek Gynecology and Pediatrics Hospital , Gaziantep 27010 , Turkey
4. Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yüzüncü Yıl University , Van 65080 , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the distribution features and antimicrobial susceptibility test results of the microorganisms isolated from the wounds of pediatric and adult patients with burn. The culture and susceptibility test results of the microorganisms, isolated from the wound swabs of the patients hospitalized in a tertiary-burn care center in 10-year period, were retrospectively screened on the microbiology department databases. Their distribution of isolated microorganisms regarding species and susceptibility test results were compared with previous studies. A total of 367 microorganisms, isolated from the burn wounds of 293 patients (13 ± 18.9 years, F/M: 0.93) (73 adults and 220 pediatric patients), were included in this study. A solitary agent was isolated in 239 (81.6%) patients, while 2 were isolated in 43 (14.7%) and 3 or more agents in 11 (3.8%). From these, 33% of the isolated microorganisms were gram-positive cocci, 61% were gram-negative bacteria, and 6% were Candida spp. The most common isolated microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus (18.5%), Pseudomonas spp. (16.9%), and Escherichia coli (11.2%), while the least common was Streptococcus spp. (2.5%). Methicillin resistance was 15% among the S. aureus strains. No resistance was observed against levofloxacin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, daptomycin, fusidic acid, and tigecycline in S. aureus strains. The highest resistance rates were observed against levofloxacin (64%), tobramycin (64%), pip/tazobactam (63%), imipenem (63%), and the lowest against colistin (5%) and ceftazidime (29%), among Pseudomonas spp. The most common causative agents in burn wound infections and their current antimicrobial susceptibility features should be well identified, in order for prevention of serious complications and optimal management the condition to occur.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Rehabilitation,Emergency Medicine,Surgery
Reference59 articles.
1. Bacterial and fungal colonization of burn wounds;de Macedo,2005
2. Infection control in the burn unit;Rafla,2011
3. Burn injury;Jeschke,2020
4. Burn wound infections;Church,2006
5. Infection prevention: unique aspects of burn units;Palmieri,2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献