Are Positive Psychology Interventions Efficacious in Chronic Pain Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

Braunwalder Céline12ORCID,Müller Rachel12,Glisic Marija13ORCID,Fekete Christine12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland

2. Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

3. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Objective Although positive psychology interventions (PPIs) are increasingly popular in chronic pain treatment their efficacy is still unclear. The objective is to summarize evidence on the effect of PPIs on pain, physical functioning, and emotional functioning in adults with chronic pain. Methods Four electronic databases and additional references were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and 2020. Findings from included studies were qualitatively and quantitatively synthesized, and study quality was assessed for risk of bias. A random effects meta-analysis model was applied for outcomes with more than four findings. Results Of 16 included RCTs, almost half delivered PPIs as self-help online interventions, and half conducted guided face-to-face interventions which lasted mostly eight weeks. Results from meta-analysis showed beneficial effects of PPIs compared to the control group on pain intensity and emotional functioning (i.e., less depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, negative affect; more positive affect) post-intervention. At 3-month follow-up, beneficial effects were maintained for depressive symptoms and positive and negative affect, but not for pain catastrophizing. However, the evidence on the long-term efficacy of PPIs and the efficacy of PPIs on physical functioning remains limited. Conclusions This review supports the notion that PPIs are beneficial to chronic pain treatment, although further, high quality research is needed to support this conclusion.

Funder

Swiss Paraplegic Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3