Modular orders on defaults in formal argumentation

Author:

Pardo Pere1,Straßer Christian2

Affiliation:

1. Computer Science Department , University of Luxembourg, L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

2. Institute Philosophy II , Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Default logic and formal argumentation are paradigmatic methods in the study of nonmonotonic inference. Defeasible information often comes in different strengths stemming from different degrees of reliability in epistemic applications or from varying strengths of authorities issuing norms in deontic applications. In both paradigms, methods have been developed to deal with prioritized knowledge bases and normative systems. Questions of comparability of these methods therefore naturally arise. Argumentation theory has been developed with a strong emphasis on unification. It is therefore a desideratum to obtain natural representations of various approaches to (prioritized) default logic within frameworks of structured argumentation, such as ASPIC. Important steps in this direction have been presented in Liao et al. (2016, 2018). In this work, we identify and address some problems in earlier translations, we broaden the focus from total to modular orderings of defaults and we consider non-normal defaults.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Logic,Hardware and Architecture,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Software,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference28 articles.

1. Default logic;Antoniou,2007

2. Prioritized sequent-based argumentation;Arieli,2018

3. Sequent-based logical argumentation;Arieli;Argument and Computation,2015

4. Argument strength in formal argumentation;Beirlaen;Journal of Applied Logics—IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications,2018

5. Reasoning by cases in structured argumentation;Beirlaen,2017

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Arguing About Choosing a Normative System: Conflict of Laws;Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications;2023-12-07

2. A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation;Artificial Intelligence;2023-09

3. Weakest Link in Formal Argumentation: Lookahead and Principle-Based Analysis;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3