Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality

Author:

Hvidberg Kristoffer B1,Kreiner Claus T2,Stantcheva Stefanie3

Affiliation:

1. University of Copenhagen and CEBI

2. University of Copenhagen, CEBI, CESifo, and CEPR

3. Harvard University, CEPR, and NBER

Abstract

Abstract We link survey data on Danish people’s perceived income positions and fairness views on inequality within various reference groups to administrative records on their reference groups, income histories, and life events. People are, on average, well-informed about the income levels of their reference groups. Yet, lower-ranked respondents in all groups tend to overestimate their own position among others because they believe others’ incomes are lower than they actually are, whereas the opposite holds true for higher-ranked respondents. Misperceptions of positions in reference groups relate to proximity to other individuals, transparency norms, and visible signals of income. People view inequalities within their co-workers and education groups as significantly more unfair than overall inequality, yet underestimate inequality the most exactly within these groups. Views on the fairness of inequalities are strongly correlated with an individual’s current position, move with shocks like unemployment or promotions, and change when experimentally informing people about their actual positions. However, the higher perceived unfairness of income differences within co-workers and education groups stays unchanged. The theoretical framework shows that this can have important implications for redistribution policy.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference54 articles.

1. The Economics of Tagging as Applied to the Optimal Income Tax, Welfare Programs, and Manpower Planning;Akerlof;The American Economic Review,1978

2. Fairness and Redistribution;Alesina;American Economic Review,2005

3. Why Doesn’t the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?;Alesina;Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,2001

4. Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities;Alesina;Journal of Public Economics,2005

5. Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution;Alesina;American Economic Review,2018

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Self-benefits, fiscal risk, and political support for the public healthcare system;European Journal of Political Economy;2024-12

2. Fairness with unequal productive skills among other-regarding individuals;The Journal of Economic Inequality;2024-07-09

3. Wealth inequality, income inequality, and subjective well-being: A cross-country study;International Journal of Management and Economics;2024-06-19

4. Unearned Inequality and Biased Distributional Preferences: Evidence from a Lab Experiment in Ghana;The Journal of Development Studies;2024-06-16

5. Shallow Meritocracy;Review of Economic Studies;2024-04-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3