Diagnostic and prognostic utility of phospholipase A activity in patients with acute pancreatitis: comparison with amylase and lipase

Author:

Kazmierczak Steven C1,Van Lente Frederick2,Hodges Edna D1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pathology and Diagnostic Medicine, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858

2. Department of Biochemistry, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation,9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195

Abstract

Abstract We compared the diagnostic and prognostic utility of phospholipase A (PLA; EC 3.1.1.4) for acute pancreatitis with that of amylase and lipase by analysis of sera from 151 consecutive patients presenting with abdominal pain in whom assays of serum amylase and (or) lipase had been ordered. We determined the diagnostic accuracy for both the initial and the peak enzyme activities. Maximal diagnostic accuracy obtained for the initial activities of amylase, lipase, and PLA was 0.83, 0.83, and 0.76 at cutoff values of 650, 650, and 41 U/L, respectively. Use of peak enzyme activities showed maximal diagnostic accuracy of 0.85, 0.86, and 0.73 at cutoff values of 650, 1050, and 42 U/L, respectively. Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis revealed the diagnostic performance of amylase and lipase to be similar, whereas that of PLA was almost random and not incremental. As with amylase and lipase, PLA activities in sera showed no relation to patients' survival; three patients who died after an attack of acute pancreatitis failed to demonstrate the dramatic increases in PLA activity previously described. We conclude that assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis by using enzyme activities still remains problematical. Measurements of amylase or lipase activities provide similar diagnostic discrimination when appropriate cutoff values are used and remain the methods of choice for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3