Abstract
Abstract
The precision of estimates of the sensitivity of diagnostic tests is evaluated. "Sensitivity" is defined as the fraction of diseased subjects with test values exceeding the 0.975-fractile of the distribution of control values. An estimate of the sensitivity is subject to sample variation because of variation of both control observations and patient observations. If gaussian distributions are assumed, the 0.95-confidence interval for a sensitivity estimate is up to +/- 0.15 for a sample of 100 controls and 100 patients. For the same sample size, minimum differences of 0.08 to 0.32 of sensitivities of two tests are established as significant with a power of 0.90. For some published diagnostic test evaluations the median sample sizes for controls and patients were 63 and 33, respectively. I show that, to obtain a reasonable precision of sensitivity estimates and a reasonable power when two tests are being compared, the number of samples should in general be considerably larger.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Sample size for the evaluation of presence-absence models;Ecological Indicators;2020-07
2. References;Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine;2011-04-01
3. Medical Journals, Statistical Articles in;Encyclopedia of Biostatistics;2005-07-15
4. Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy;Statistical Methods in Medical Research;1998-08
5. Likelihood ratios: A real improvement for clinical decision making?;European Journal of Epidemiology;1994-02