Nutrient Enrichment of Human Milk with Human and Bovine Milk-Based Fortifiers for Infants Born <1250 g: 18-month Neurodevelopment Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Author:

Hopperton Kathryn E1,O'Connor Deborah L12,Bando Nicole1ORCID,Conway Aisling M1,Ng Dawn V Y1,Kiss Alex34,Jackson Jacqueline5,Ly Linh6,Unger Sharon L2675ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

2. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

3. Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

4. Evaluative and Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute and the Institute of Health Policy

5. Department of Paediatrics, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada

6. Division of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

7. Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background Bovine milk-based fortifiers (BMBF) have been standard of care for nutrient fortification of feeds for very low birthweight (VLBW) infants, however there is increasing use of human milk-based fortifiers (HMBF) in neonatal care despite additional costs and limited supporting data. No randomized clinical trial has followed infants fed these fortifiers after initial hospitalization. Objective To compare neurodevelopment in infants born weighing <1250 g fed mother's milk with supplemental donor milk and either a HMBF or BMBF. Methods This is a follow-up of a completed pragmatic, triple-blind, parallel randomized clinical trial conducted in Southern Ontario between August 2014 and March 2016 (NCT02137473) with feeding tolerance as the primary outcome. Infants weighing <1250 g at birth were block randomized by an online third-party service to receive either HMBF (n = 64) or BMBF (n = 63) added to mother's milk with supplemental donor milk during hospitalization. Neurodevelopment was assessed at 18-months corrected age using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Follow-up was completed October 2017. Results Of the 127 infants randomized, 109 returned for neurodevelopmental assessment. No statistically significant differences between fortifiers were identified for cognitive composite scores (adjusted scores 94.7 in the HMBF group and 95.9 in the BMBF group; fully adjusted mean difference, −1.1 [95% CI: −6.5 to 4.4]), language composite scores (adjusted scores 92.4 in the HMBF group and 93.1 in the BMBF; fully adjusted mean difference, −1.2 [−7.5 to 5.1]), or motor composite scores (adjusted scores 95.6 in the HMBF group and 97.7 in the BMBF; fully adjusted mean difference, −1.1 [−6.3 to 4.2]). There was no difference in the proportion of participants that died or had neurodevelopmental impairment or disability between groups. Conclusions Providing HMBF compared to BMBF does not improve neurodevelopment scores at 18-months corrected age in infants born <1250 g otherwise fed a human milk diet. Trial Registration: NCT02137473, clinicaltrials.gov.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Food Science,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3