Will supplemental cone beam computed tomography change the treatment plan of impacted maxillary canines based on 2D radiography? A prospective clinical study

Abstract

Abstract Aim To evaluate the impact of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines; secondly, to identify CBCT factors influencing a change in the treatment plan; and thirdly, to assess 2D radiographic factors that can aid in selecting appropriate candidates for CBCT. Material and methods Patients with impacted maxillary canines and an overlap of a neighboring tooth in 2D radiographs and the suspicion of root resorption were referred for CBCT examination. An initial treatment plan was based on 2D radiographs, and the final treatment plan was established after the CBCT examination. Logistic regression analyses and t-tests were performed to evaluate differences in radiographic findings between the groups with and without a change in treatment plan. Results The study prospectively included 125 impacted canines, and 43 (34.4%) of them had a change in treatment plan after the CBCT examination. The most common change was a modification in the direction of cantilever traction (n = 28; 22.4%), while the least common was the change in decision to remove/keep the canine (n = 4; 3.2%). The size of the alpha and lateral angles had a significant impact on the decision to change the treatment plan. Other radiographic findings did not influence a change in treatment plan. Conclusions One-third of the canines had a change in treatment plan after supplemental CBCT examination. Canines with large alpha and lateral angles measured in the panoramic image were found to be significantly more likely to undergo changes in the initial direction of cantilever traction or changes to the canine extraction strategy following CBCT examination.